Damus
CarteBlanche · 1w
Because the inscriptions make the money more traceable? Which, if that’s what you mean makes sats not so fungible. I apologize, I’m not nearly as technically proficient as you.
 DagzTagz  profile picture
No it’s okay it’s more actually a historical thing… the thing is Luke is actually right. The problem is so are Eric and Amir.

We actually need RDTS in case governments try to attack bitcoin like they tried on BSV but we have to keep the black market chain the longest for the future when nation states aren’t actually the way we dictate relay policy (standardness)
2
CarteBlanche · 1w
Thank you for dropping knowledge. I really do appreciate you taking the time. I will research your response until I understand it completely. I am trying to learn as fast as I can. I’ve only been in bitcoin for 14 months.
Cykros · 1w
I'm curious what your take on it not actually being sufficient to keep data off chain is. As I understand it, it may make arbitrary data a bit more expensive, and break it up into pieces, but at the end of the day, Peter Todd's stunt putting the whole text of BIP-444 in a compliant transaction seem...