On what fucking planet is putting up $140k in bitcoin to secure 70K cuckbucks at 12% APR and margin calls and liquidations at 70% and 80% LTV, is that “incredible useful” ? A regular fiat loan has...
Umm... Not really. As someone who recently worked for a fiat lender, our unsecured loans were at 15%, and that is on the low side, because it was a credit union.
Certain collateralized loans had lower rates, but currently only as low as 5.5%-6% for the most qualified borrowers, but you have to remember that the type of collateral most institutions are lending on isn't nearly as volatile as Bitcoin.
There is also the issue that Strike doesn't have permission to print money. They have to incentivize lenders to put up 100% of the amount financed, while most traditional institutions only keep reserves of maybe 10% and they get to create the rest of the money out of thin air. Strike, on the other hand, has to offer their lenders an interest rate that is attractive enough to outweigh the opportunity cost of putting the money somewhere else, because they don't get to fund new money into existence like a bank can.
Certain collateralized loans had lower rates, but currently only as low as 5.5%-6% for the most qualified borrowers, but you have to remember that the type of collateral most institutions are lending on isn't nearly as volatile as Bitcoin.
There is also the issue that Strike doesn't have permission to print money. They have to incentivize lenders to put up 100% of the amount financed, while most traditional institutions only keep reserves of maybe 10% and they get to create the rest of the money out of thin air. Strike, on the other hand, has to offer their lenders an interest rate that is attractive enough to outweigh the opportunity cost of putting the money somewhere else, because they don't get to fund new money into existence like a bank can.
2🤙1