Damus
note14jupd...
Little Johnny profile picture
Yes, he is very intelligent. No question about it.

I agree that Michael’s current path is incompatible with Bitcoin as freedom money. I also think that he is perfectly aware of it.

If we define being “in Bitcoin” the way Satoshi intended Bitcoin to be used and understood (“A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.”), I don’t know how many people Saylor has brought into Bitcoin.

He has brought many people into the “digital gold / digital Manhattan / digital credit” space, but instead of aligning himself with Satoshi’s vision, he has (at times) been pretty hostile towards the idea of peer-to-peer cash and self-custody.

Nobody knows what’s his agenda and what is going on in his head, but what I find very confusing is this:

Satoshi made it perfectly clear that Bitcoin is supposed to be peer-to-peer cash. And in some kind of sly roundabout way Saylor has managed to convince many “Bitcoiners” that Bitcoin is NOT peer-to-peer cash.

And now I am looking at Saylor like this:

2
hodlher · 16w
Fun thread to read here ^ thanks for sharing your thoughts. I asked nostr:nprofile1qqsvf646uxlreajhhsv9tms9u6w7nuzeedaqty38z69cpwyhv89ufcqpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucm4wfex2mn59en8j6gpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5lzw932 about this once in the Q&A session of Mailbag Monday. He went on ...
Kush · 16w
Based J… sound as a self custody sat