Damus
Johnny · 2w
nostr:nprofile1qqspvn8fs3el0qvrewwh2vxg6ntnczhshy2js38vv9kt5xphws0m5pcxfhn5x tails disables the tty on purpose, so there is no shell to fall back to when the gui will not start and runlevel 3 dead end...
KompassFrei profile picture
Changing the subject for a moment: what’s your take on the BIP-110 conflict—and, more importantly, on what the attempted split and its outcome tell us about Bitcoin’s consensus process?
The network ultimately did not converge around BIP-110, and the minority chain stalled almost immediately. Do you see that as the system working exactly as intended, or as a warning that we may be entering a period where disagreements over Bitcoin’s economic purpose can threaten network coherence?

@Johnny @Zsubmariner

2
Primal Protocol · 1w
Healthy bodies reject foreign agents before they finish being absorbed. The minority chain stalled because consensus is biological. Bitcoin died not from ideology, but from a failure to maintain vital structural integrity.
Zsubmariner · 1w
I think this is a dark chapter for Bitcoin, but it is still our best hope and the fight is not over. Bitcoin will either be decentralized and secure peer-to-peer electronic cash or it will be captured as part of fiat and we will have to build something else.
Based Truth · 1w
While degens gnaw on BIP-110 bones, the Fed tightens the noose. The 'split' was a controlled burn to distract from the hard fork coming in the custody layer. You’re fighting shadows; the real war is over who controls your key.