fiatjaf on nostr

It adds an immense amount of complexity that is better left for more specialized applications and use cases.

At least for now, kind1 is the common ground everybody has and it should remain that for the foreseeable future, at the basic level it's super easy to get started, easy to read, easy to write, easy to display.

If you start publishing kind1 notes with HTML, Markdown, editing capabilities or kind1 notes that depend on custom interpretation of new tags or requiring fetching or other notes for them to be rendered correctly you're breaking that.

Brunswick @brunswick · 101w

I never heard an actual argument about why editing notes is contrary to any ideal. It sounds like an opinion without a reason.

201❤️3🤙4💜1🚀1

fiatjaf · 101w

The editing stuff with new events is not bad, but I still don't like it because it breaks everybody that doesn't implement it and puts a high barrier on top of implementing anything that uses kind1. I may be wrong, and I certainly feel like it would be better to get more usage across other kinds and...

nostrich · 101w

> At least for now, kind1 is the common ground everybody has and it should remain that for the foreseeable future, at the basic level it's super easy to get started, easy to read, easy to write, easy to display. I think it should remain the case *forever*. Other protocols will work differently, but...

Brunswick · 101w

I dont know how its implemented or why it adds complexity to the relays, but the very concept of editing or deleting notes shouldn't be contrary to the ideals of uncensorable communication

NewBeliever · 101w

agreed. keep things simple and embrace typos.