Have you considered that if this information was not available to the public it’s reasonable to assume that Jack didn’t have access to it either.

Guilt by association is not the same thing as being complicit in the acts.

If you did business with someone who later was revealed as a child rapist does that make you also a terrible person.

If, as you are implying, any who has done business with someone named in the Epstein files deserves to be treated in the same way as the people actually named that’s a lot of people. Most of whom probably had no clue.

If Trump is named does that mean that anyone who has ever had business with him is also tainted?

If Larry Fink is named same question?

I don’t know if Jack had prior knowledge and I’m sure you don’t either so let’s not tar him with the same brush simply because he did business with them.