Damus
Jeff Booth · 26w
This podcast with nostr:npub1s5yq6wadwrxde4lhfs56gn64hwzuhnfa6r9mj476r5s4hkunzgzqrs6q7z and myself talking with Jack and Nick, about the paper they released today is going to create some huge debates....
Trivium profile picture

This is purely rhetorical and farcical.

You could substitute Litecoin for Bitcoin and the agruments would be identical.

The entire paper is one Equivocation Fallacy after another with some physics words (many times misused) thrown in.




4๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿค™1
Juraj๐Ÿด๐Ÿ’›๐ŸŒ˜ · 26w
Where's the paper? I want to check it out. Don't want to listen to the pod after reading this take, I suspect I'll be done with it in three minutes.
Jordan Gaudreau · 21w
Did you miss the entire point? Yes, Litecoin is a fork of Bitcoin so sure. But ur mistaking the lens for what is being honed in on it seems.
CypherCitizen · 14w
"Bitcoin philosophers" gone completely off the rails.
๐•žptf · 14w
nail on head. its like having a wank with long words. you dont need to go to a lab to test yiur hypothesis, just buy a bitaxe