@ODELL , I genuinely want your view on this, especially after seeing this post.
Around 20% of nodes have upgraded to v30 within six months. A significant portion of the community opposes the change, and several developers themselves say it has had virtually no meaningful impact on the blockchain’s data volume.
Yet there has been no visible sign of reconsideration or willingness to reassess.
If the practical effects are minimal, adoption remains low, and resistance is clearly evident, what explanation, other than ego or control, would justify continuing to push it forward?
And in your reasoning, how is this meaningfully different from the dynamics we see around the BIP110 proposal?