Damus
Vitor Pamplona · 66w
I am a self-custody maxi, but at the same time, custodial systems must NEVER fail. Imagine if every 3 years Fidelity went bust and all people's assets were gone. That would be ridiculous. We have bee...
Jeroen Ubbink profile picture
I think cashu is still quite young. Many developers jumped on board and eventually lost interest or did not have more time. It's still unpaid work in the end.

The protocol still changes and probably still needs these changes to be better in the future. Maybe there should be more focus on (trying to have) backwards compatibility or easier forward migrations.

Maybe it's not your intention but if i were spending a lot of unpaid time on a project i would not be very happy with people complaining about me sacrificing my time. This does not motivate. Instead we should figure out and come up with ideas and suggestions on how to move forward.

In the end we get to choose if we feel like this is usable or not, unlike Fidelity there are red flags all around the project stating you may lose your funds. Nobody relies on this project nor should you make yourself reliant on it at this stage.
2
calle · 66w
I don't understand this post or what Cashu has to do with Fidelity. Seriously baffled. 1) It's a custodial system. Of course you can lose funds. We're just being honest because we don't need to sell you anything. 2) I'm not aware of any losses due to an "unstable" mint. 3) The number of developers ...