I would simply add that bip110 is solving a non existing problem. Is bitcoin working as it should? Yes. Are normal transactions being crowded out by nfts and whatnot? No. Then what are you even trying...
Rejecting bip 110 would be the real problem. Since core 30 was launched - Bitcoins’ largest liquidation event in history happened days later, lowest fear and greed index, Adam back was proven to be meeting Epstein, core devs made changes in order to satisfy VC funded and corporate interests (e.g., easier support for layer-2 rollups, metadata, inscriptions, NFTs, or DeFi apps on Bitcoin ) making Bitcoin susceptible to non monetary data storage.
I could go on for days….
It’s a soft fork, restricting rules. If you use Bitcoin as money, it’s a welcome and long awaited improvement - a return to what it was before it centralized at the node level.
I could go on for days….
It’s a soft fork, restricting rules. If you use Bitcoin as money, it’s a welcome and long awaited improvement - a return to what it was before it centralized at the node level.
1
