Damus
maven leo · 52w
Frankly I don’t understand the need to disappear 🤔
Bitcoin Knight ⚔️ · 52w
Probably would have left eventually but the timetable was pushed forward with Gavin talking to the CIA
Kendy · 52w
“The most notable indication came in April 2011, when Satoshi sent an email to developer Mike Hearn stating, "I've moved on to other things. It's in good hands with Gavin and everyone." This was one of the last direct communications from Satoshi and marked a clear signal of their intent to step aw...
Jack K · 52w
What does the Bible say? We “killed” Satoshi by creating the very conditions that required his departure. Satoshi vanishing is both a sacrifice and a test, forcing us to take ownership of the system that was given. “But I tell you the truth: it is for your good that I am going away. Unless ...
db · 52w
He was smart enough to create bitcoin, so definitely smart enough to know that he had to disappear.
Diyana · 52w
https://njump.me/nevent1qqs23xq97qzzkhp06aur3maelwpehaqykef3302qpd44x9s83p7m04gpzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7q3q9aftr8lpgz8knmswjz0d3l9vzwx97dcvqh0zfuxcxu9d57t4yv3sxpqqqqqqzgqvlcr
mlclm · 52w
Planned
Connie · 52w
I think it was planned
brisceaux · 52w
I mean....he could have just died.
Brisket · 52w
There are no coincidences.
Deleted Account · 52w
The convenience of mything is the coincidence of my thing.. #Bitcoin
Bitcoin Berries · 52w
Logically centralisation couldn't work with him/them at the helm. But he still retained a say in case it was ever needed. Where we stand today, whether that's by design or default or accident, is an entirely separate matter. But I like to think that there are latent custodians with influence tinkeri...