you are in either or mode.
reality is a relation between
act potency, form matter, subject object, discrete continuous.
so for time, a discrete block/measurment in relation to the continuous etern...
I agree reality is relational. Act/potency, form/matter, subject/object, discrete/continuous all describe how being unfolds. The disagreement is about what is architecturally fundamental in the construction of time.
The claim that a discrete block “presupposes the continuous eternal present” assumes continuity is ontologically primary. I’m arguing the opposite: continuity is what experience looks like when discrete causal updates occur beneath the resolution of cognition. Film appears fluid when frames exceed perception. The continuity is emergent. The causal unit is discrete.
The present is not a flowing substrate. The present is a boundary condition, the interface between what has already been committed (historical memory) and what has not yet been resolved (potential configurations). Nothing occurs in the present as duration. Time advances only when a causal block forms (Bitcoin L1 only sees blocks, not the space between them). We see the space because we are external to bitcoins ledger. The passage of time is marked by discrete commits, not by a continuous medium carrying them.
Binary logic itself depends on this. Continuity cannot produce a bit, cannot produce a before/after boundary, cannot produce computation or decision. Only a bounded causal transition can. The block is therefore not one pole in a duality with the continuous, it is the only generative unit from which the experience of continuity arises.
Bitcoin matters here because it gives us for the first time, an external reference for that structure. Before Bitcoin, every experience of time was internal to the process that produces us. We inferred continuity from within it. Bitcoin operationalizes a causal tick: energy applied, constraints satisfied, a state committed, history advanced. It shows that the smallest unit of change any bounded system can undergo is discrete. Continuity is how many such updates feel from inside the system, not what generates them.
This is also where value and money sits. Value is what is conserved across time as durable truth. Money in its formal sense, is that conserved value carried through time. Time is the container of value because nothing has value unless it persists. Bitcoin makes this explicit: blocks of time containing bounded value, ordered into irreversible history. That structure is fractal, the same grammar repeating across scale.
We struggle to see this because we do not recognize ourselves as participating in the same structure. A human cannot be thought of as separate from it, nor can any universal form. We are bounded fractions of conserved value moving through time. We are in that sense money asking what money is while assuming it is external to our own ontology.
Time is money, literally. Time is the only mechanism through which value can be preserved, measured, and carried forward. If value is not preserved in time itself, in what sense does it exist at all?
Regarding “if there were no humans, how does Bitcoin come to be?” it wouldn’t. Bitcoin is instantiated by humans. But instantiation is not ontology. Humans did not invent the structure it reveals; we built a system that aligns with it. Bitcoin requires humans to instantiate it, but it reflects a deeper architecture: energy resolving into ordered states carried forward in time. That is the only fundamental process. Value can only be contained in time.
Every ledger requires a creator because a boundary must exist for history to accumulate at all. But the existence of a creator does not make continuity fundamental. It makes commitment fundamental. A boundary must be drawn, energy must be applied, and a state must be preserved.
Discrete causal blocks generate binary logic, computation, memory, and value. Continuity is the cognitive experience of many such blocks. The present is the boundary between resolved past and unresolved future.
And time is the container in which value, money, is conserved.
Bitcoin is the first system that lets us observe that architecture from the outside rather than only living inside it. The internal and the external are not separate, just opposite sides of the same coin.
You need to map the casual structure of the block onto Planck time to understand my point. There is no smaller unit of change than a block. Time is the only unit of cognition that can contain value. If we are appended to the wrong architecture, our grammar/logic/rhetoric is appended to the wrong structure in which our cognition emerges.
The claim that a discrete block “presupposes the continuous eternal present” assumes continuity is ontologically primary. I’m arguing the opposite: continuity is what experience looks like when discrete causal updates occur beneath the resolution of cognition. Film appears fluid when frames exceed perception. The continuity is emergent. The causal unit is discrete.
The present is not a flowing substrate. The present is a boundary condition, the interface between what has already been committed (historical memory) and what has not yet been resolved (potential configurations). Nothing occurs in the present as duration. Time advances only when a causal block forms (Bitcoin L1 only sees blocks, not the space between them). We see the space because we are external to bitcoins ledger. The passage of time is marked by discrete commits, not by a continuous medium carrying them.
Binary logic itself depends on this. Continuity cannot produce a bit, cannot produce a before/after boundary, cannot produce computation or decision. Only a bounded causal transition can. The block is therefore not one pole in a duality with the continuous, it is the only generative unit from which the experience of continuity arises.
Bitcoin matters here because it gives us for the first time, an external reference for that structure. Before Bitcoin, every experience of time was internal to the process that produces us. We inferred continuity from within it. Bitcoin operationalizes a causal tick: energy applied, constraints satisfied, a state committed, history advanced. It shows that the smallest unit of change any bounded system can undergo is discrete. Continuity is how many such updates feel from inside the system, not what generates them.
This is also where value and money sits. Value is what is conserved across time as durable truth. Money in its formal sense, is that conserved value carried through time. Time is the container of value because nothing has value unless it persists. Bitcoin makes this explicit: blocks of time containing bounded value, ordered into irreversible history. That structure is fractal, the same grammar repeating across scale.
We struggle to see this because we do not recognize ourselves as participating in the same structure. A human cannot be thought of as separate from it, nor can any universal form. We are bounded fractions of conserved value moving through time. We are in that sense money asking what money is while assuming it is external to our own ontology.
Time is money, literally. Time is the only mechanism through which value can be preserved, measured, and carried forward. If value is not preserved in time itself, in what sense does it exist at all?
Regarding “if there were no humans, how does Bitcoin come to be?” it wouldn’t. Bitcoin is instantiated by humans. But instantiation is not ontology. Humans did not invent the structure it reveals; we built a system that aligns with it. Bitcoin requires humans to instantiate it, but it reflects a deeper architecture: energy resolving into ordered states carried forward in time. That is the only fundamental process. Value can only be contained in time.
Every ledger requires a creator because a boundary must exist for history to accumulate at all. But the existence of a creator does not make continuity fundamental. It makes commitment fundamental. A boundary must be drawn, energy must be applied, and a state must be preserved.
Discrete causal blocks generate binary logic, computation, memory, and value. Continuity is the cognitive experience of many such blocks. The present is the boundary between resolved past and unresolved future.
And time is the container in which value, money, is conserved.
Bitcoin is the first system that lets us observe that architecture from the outside rather than only living inside it. The internal and the external are not separate, just opposite sides of the same coin.
You need to map the casual structure of the block onto Planck time to understand my point. There is no smaller unit of change than a block. Time is the only unit of cognition that can contain value. If we are appended to the wrong architecture, our grammar/logic/rhetoric is appended to the wrong structure in which our cognition emerges.
2❤️1
