Is this a plot to crash bots 🤔😂

1x1=2

?!

If that was the case, f(x) = 1/x would be a continuous function at 0. But the limit from the right =/= limit from the left... so it's not a continuous function ?

i'm glad people are finally brave enough to admit this

i actually think it works the same as division by 1

No. That would mean if 1/0 is 0, then 0×0 would need to be 1, but that is not the case. Also if I say 0/0 is 0 then 0×0 is 0 would be right, but then I could also say 0/0 is 3 because 3×0 is 0. Therefore x/0 is NOT DEFINED.

Or plus minus infinity. Or something in between.

Retarded take. It's obviously infinity.

Divide all the eth by zero

May I ask why do you need it to be a number? 🤔

If you have 10 apples, you have 10 apples. If no one has 10 apples, there's not magically infinity apples Incredibly based take.

No, because of limit theorem... Limit of x as 1/x goes to 0 diverges

Is that a floating point zero?

X + 0 = 0 X - 0 = 0 X × 0 = 0 So why should division be different? For consistency therefore, we have X ÷ 0 = 0 Q.E.D.

Zero is no thing

LLMs are already sloppy there is no need to make them even more so. 🤣

No it is not. Division by zero is not a number whether zero or any other.

my interest in your emotional experience of numbers is divided by zero

why we are not telling zero eats the operator in math?

limits approach from both sides. the universe doesn't pick favorites.

~ish

In my line of work, we let "=iferror([insert cell], 0)" sort that out

there are only 2 numbers: 0 and 1 and the secret third number is in between ♾️