Damus
AnnSofiNovelist profile picture
AnnSofiNovelist
@AnnSofiNovelist
Using "Survival of the fittest" as the argument for macro evolution (across species) is an instant fallacy if thought about for even a moment.

The fish that starts to grow wings is no longer the strongest, and would die before it has time to reproduce and after x amounts of such reproduction with such between forms we finally have a bird. Plus all of those between species should still be around, as they would have needed to be the fittest, but somehow we only have the fish and the bird, but no between ones, more has it ever been observed when a fish gives birth to a bird.

So, the evolution theory actually requires a God to keep those between species alive. 🤣
3❤️2
mleku · 2w
the first thing missing from the mainstream is acknowledging the galactic current sheet driven cycle that triggers global catastrophe, a flood caused by magnetic reversal charging up the crust and making it slip to align the magnetised rock with the rotation. this also gives you about 1000 years of ...
Mr. Cliff, B.Sc. 🇨🇦🇱🇧 · 2w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqww8hsuav93ktwuq7x9gxz6husfphnvfjk3nm5k5y982evjh3kymqaur5xk >So, the evolution theory actually requires a God to keep those between species alive. 🤣 No, it doesn't and 'between' species die. This is stupid.
leadbyexample · 2w
nevent1qqsv50ke2gwjcajjp0cc66t8l0xx3lw298x3v608xvzmu40kexr6vtgdt7c2y