Damus
djmeistro✝️ 🍊💊⚡️ · 26w
https://blossom.primal.net/9e4e9fabb64587fc0ae0714782fb0e724ba2e87ded3d803b6209833df48b5e28.gif That's all I got
Karnage · 26w
Why? Most of these are false. Anyone with half a brain understands why. Why waste time on this garbage?
R · 26w
My response would be; Blah blah blah, looks like you got yourself a nice pile of “facts”. So you don’t want to acquire any bitcoin? Nobody cares. Where are you going to put your savings instead? Stocks, bonds, real estate, art, gold, classic cars? Cool, I’m sure there’s no downsides ...
Baerson · 26w
FACT: Staying poor is never fun, ever!
planta · 26w
Most of it is correct, but he misunderstood the concept of decentralised… we all know is not about fairly distributed coins, but fairly distributed protocol.
Redstack · 26w
I’ll take two finite mining pools with 49% to 52% than one Fed limitless mining pool at 100%.
Kim Stock · 26w
This is why SIGNUM exists!
ihsotas · 26w
Sounds like this person will be having fun while staying poor. Decentralization is not wealth distribution because owning lots of bitcoin gives you no more control over the network than owning 1 bitcoin.
Jake Woodhouse · 26w
Nice list How about do the same thing with the USD? Then let’s talk
PlebInstitute · 26w
Someone should explain to him the difference between decentralized and distributed 🤷🏽‍♂️
rev.hodl · 26w
The only thing that comes to mind is that this dude must be a huge pussy.
Hide&Seek · 25w
Mining pools doesn't control anything, any miner is free to switch mining pool anytime. Also, concentration of wealth & decentralization of the infrastructure are two different things. Reasoning from facts doesn't prevent cherry picking 🤔