Damus
Open in Damus
Super Testnet profile picture
Super Testnet
@Super Testnet
Why is there no URSF for BIP110 yet? As of now, miners may lose 8% of their users in September unless they comply with BIP110, so it seems in their interest to do so. But a popular URSF can switch that and make them lose *more* users if they *do* comply.
21
Super Testnet · 1d
One way to do a URSF is to reject the block *after* BIP110's activation block unless it contains a tx that violates one of BIP110's restrictions. If enough people run it, miners have to choose: make the BIP110 people fork off or make the URSF people fork off. They can't keep both
Judge Hardcase · 1d
It seems to me that Coinbase alone could decide to make a URSF defacto "popular" whenever they wanted to - and the majoriry of miners would almost be certain to follow. It would be at that point that BIP110 users and miners - presumably still in the minority - would have to choose whether or not t...
Stirling Forge · 1d
Would you be running a URSF if it existed and why? Where do you stand on this stuff? From your comments right here, it seems like OPIF is the reason why you might be against it. What functionality makes OP_IF important to you if you are anti-BIP 110?