Damus
Super Testnet · 1d
Why is there no URSF for BIP110 yet? As of now, miners may lose 8% of their users in September unless they comply with BIP110, so it seems in their interest to do so. But a popular URSF can switch tha...
Super Testnet profile picture
One way to do a URSF is to reject the block *after* BIP110's activation block unless it contains a tx that violates one of BIP110's restrictions. If enough people run it, miners have to choose: make the BIP110 people fork off or make the URSF people fork off. They can't keep both
1🤔1
Aaron van Wirdum · 1d
No miners are currently signaling support for BIP110, so investing time and effort in developing a URSF client seems like a waste of time and effort at this time (to me, anyways). Much easier to just use the rejectblock command post-fork if a BIP110 block that forks the chain is ever mined.
AncapAnon - Activate OP_GFY now! · 21h
It will hurt my bags but I can’t help but be glad that noderunners will not be passive and hand the decision over to miners.