nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq9zsljfx8tjyzplququr9xmqctclx0qc2mw5xydzx0udqzrfade4qmtrtl5 I think you're missing a digit... I understand when you say random access you mean ac...
@nprofile1q...
No, I definitely mean 3MB/s. That's been my pretty consistent observation on random-access HDD performance on Linux and Windows. It's *that* slow.
That's assuming all reads miss the cache. Otherwise, yeah, it'll be faster.
I didn't manually rig anything to get this result. This is real-world desktop performance reading many scattered files (which defrag doesn't help much), as reported by GKrellM and Task Manager.
Perhaps a faster HDD would be faster, but 🤷♂️.
No, I definitely mean 3MB/s. That's been my pretty consistent observation on random-access HDD performance on Linux and Windows. It's *that* slow.
That's assuming all reads miss the cache. Otherwise, yeah, it'll be faster.
I didn't manually rig anything to get this result. This is real-world desktop performance reading many scattered files (which defrag doesn't help much), as reported by GKrellM and Task Manager.
Perhaps a faster HDD would be faster, but 🤷♂️.
1