Damus
Hagbud · 23w
I can follow all of what you are saying. I still don't understand why it should be a good idea to raise the OP_return limit. You didn't address the argument from nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvt...
Bitcoin Mechanic profile picture
Lol.

PoW exists to make it hard to rewrite history, not to prevent spam.

This is obviously just more dishonesty masquerading as "bridge building" after a week of non-stop character assassination after many months of bad faith interaction.

Citing your credentials "I have worked on anonymous systems for over a decade. I have read tons of research on spam detection, rate-limiting, and I've implemented spam prevention techniques in the real world."

...is not enough to make people pretend you're arguing in good faith here which you obviously aren't having opened with rewriting the entire function of what PoW does and how Satoshi used it. We know specifically what Satoshi did about spam and you're ignoring it because that would contradict your premise.

(Further - spam filtration does not imply centralization. The opposite is the case. No one is going to run nodes if they do not posses the tools to prevent their mempools filling up with porn/malware and anything else that can leverage the idiocy of Bitcoin's developers.)
1010❤️46🤙8❤️5💯1🔥1🫂1
Proof of Woodwork · 23w
You replied to the wrong guy. Thank you for yourknowledge 🙏
josearkaos · 23w
Dude, is this debate super important?
ESE · 23w
Wild to hear the creator of a centralized mint system lecture Bitcoin about centralization. Cashu literally runs on trusted mints
Hobbit · 23w
Do you think that the intention of Blockstream to bring simplicity into Bitcoin code is why they want to have a centralized dev group?
Kayne · 23w
Ask yourself. Who benefits by pricing normal people out of node running? Who benefits by centralisation? Who benefits from making Bitcoin illegal? Because allowing child abuse material "spam" as y'all call it, on the blockchain is going to make it illegal to run a node. And all that extra data t...
Stvu · 23w
Go build something
Force2B · 23w
nostr:nprofile1qqsfzhzjvd72tkpz6cjdczhnn292ynayr6p0a33kmlfel0zxsq798agpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9unytnpdenk7u3wd9hsz9rhwden5te0wfehxtnwdaejuum0vd5kzmqlq6aly catching strays
Tony Acid · 23w
wait a minute... are you implying PoW plays no role in spam prevention?
Tony Acid · 22w
nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgkwaehxw309a5xjum59ehx7um5wghxcctwvshsfmrzrk you don't want to miss this daily dose of entertainment ;)
calle · 22w
cry harder 😂 https://blossom.primal.net/43c90380e5e98d2b0dd4fe32c175dbcba65cc0a2e195bd32e701cf4ab9a91fe8.jpg
nostrich · 22w
Mechanic just go to X and ask Adam Back why he created PoW. He is kind enough to tell you.
McCoy · 22w
Reading Calle's post + my 2 sats: POW as utilized by the bitcoin solves consensus without an authority. Add in DA to emit coins without an authority who takes profit = slower/fixed and fair coin emission. Requiring Fees + creating competition (blk size limit) to transact "slows down" transaction ...
nomadshiba⚡ · 22w
they don't under the difference between spam prevention and rate limiting. i can get a spam email once a year. spam has nothing to do with rate im getting emails. i can also get one thousands of non-spam emails per day.