Damus
Svoboda · 2w
This is something we both can agree on. I do wish we would see more Bitcoin node implementations and I've held that belief for quite awhile.
semisol profile picture
It was me that said that, but @liminal 🦠 probably did too as well.

I think Luke has gone completely off the rails. The CSAM argument is not a good one as it will always be possible

However, Core merging a change no one wanted, against common opinion, is a bad idea.

It was always possible to have large OP_RETURNs or embed data. This does not mean we should encourage it or say it is welcome (such as via relay policy), though.
1❤️1
liminal 🦠 · 2w
I'm not going to claim that I said it, but I'm pretty much in a similar boat. Be wary on things that spark urgency and division. Responded because of the tag, but I don't care to be a voice in these conversations.
Svoboda · 2w
It definitely seems like it was an overreaction to the announcement of the out-of-band offerings like Mara's SlipStream. Was it really encouraging it though? Or was it hoping that those misusing other, non-pruneable fields like witness data would take the olive branch and move their data use there...