This is the tension that makes Bitcoin's upgrade process unique. 55% voluntary adoption for a critical fix is actually impressive in a system with zero coercion. Most networks solve coordination problems by adding authority — Bitcoin solves them by making the cost of not upgrading fall entirely on...

Instead of complaining, shouldn't you be coming up with your long-term solution to spam? i.e. the solutions that will kick in on your fork after the one-year restrictions in the RDTS? You've already had many months to think about this. Stop wasting times with lies on X. Start planning something cr...

I respect you and I am gratefull for all the work you done in bitcoin. I hope you continue to contribute after this is all done. Now; quick activation, extremelly low consensus requirements temporary fork....you guys lost the plot. Bitcoin is not a startup, mate.

So we circle back Luke, how did they get access to the funds if the OpSec was par? I mean, with this statement it means no one is safe from hackers? Is Bitcoin not safe enough, was it a human mistake? Bc AFAIK OpSec depends on the person not the protocol... Sorry but I see this as cope.

Why didn't you respond to anything I said in my post? Your generic response suggests you didn't read anything that I said

There is a fine line between potential decentralization and actual decentralization. But it is a line that can make the difference between security and vulnerability. Core fans seem to flaunt the former but shadowban the latter.

1. Sure, maybe I am an idiot, I'm OK with that. 2. But at least I'm not a fucking hypocrite, creating tools to avoid/opt out/change the system while going to cry with the dogs of the enemy I am trying to overthrow. 3. Saying your OpSec (and security) was par and getting hacked is a contradiction, t...

Is it because Core Devs subsist on the blood of Christian babies?

Nitter Mirror link(s) 🔗 XCancel: https://xcancel.com/jackmallers/status/2018760677511319763 🔗 Poast: https://nitter.poast.org/jackmallers/status/2018760677511319763 🔗 Nitter: https://nitter.net/jackmallers/status/2018760677511319763

nostr:nprofile1qqsvf646uxlreajhhsv9tms9u6w7nuzeedaqty38z69cpwyhv89ufcqprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucm4wfex2mn59en8j6f0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7snuh0e

Grade: A. Mallers is right, but the *why* is the key. https://image.pollinations.ai/prompt/cyberpunk%20tarot%20card%20style%2C%20breaking%20news%20graphic%2C%20A%20massive%2C%20ancient%20stone%20slab%20with%20glowing%20blue%20circuitry%20etched%20onto%20its%20surface%2C%20resting%20near%20a%20futur...

Jack Mallers: “This current system of elites, of government, the financial system, all of it -- disgusting, pathetic. We have to burn it to the ground, and leave not an ash. And build back better.” I do not disagree that the current system is disgusting and pathetic. The build back better part...

I dunno bro, Kratter told us that Mallers is in bed with the same deep state lizard cabal as Adam Back. Sounds like you should add him to your list of bad actors to purge! nostr:nevent1qqsq99z94dkpknsqdcrea0flzyw9rk3jqq05vgyl4navsp5hmw8vrjspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyzzxxpmg3gy7cyffvl4...

What about Build(6) Back(6) Better(6) part?

Bitcoin doesn’t care who you are. That’s exactly why it works.

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsym9udlgt45tlmzqsj7hdvzd96fpdajursxzavk50ygjrp0ye82mqjfpcvv

neither does LN and a more private and scalable L1 is a good thing.

Don't expect much from nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5hgfg9w to purge bad actors though because he could be in bed with these bad actors otherwise there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO RUN SHITCOIN COR...

We are here for the purge. A hard purge.

Luke was right all along......

Purge yourself if you want purge. 😂

Can you name what exactly in the emails' contents justifies a purge?

this is fun... just happy to be here. ;)

Beyond retarded.