And who said that as Bitcoin grows, running a node was supposed to stay inexpensive?
It just feels like the BIP110โers have a vision on what they want and are not letting Bitcoin move freely. โCentralizationโ โspamโ seem like labels for โI want control over what Bitcoin looks likeโ
Of course big actors were going to get involved. Of course big miners in the most developed nations were going to take control over the hashrate. But again, I feel this is all short minded. If future global trade will be settled in bitcoin, itโs not wrong to expect nations will start to capture some of the hash and democratize it. Weโre at a point weโre the most economically developed nations are seeing bitcoins potential and joining ship
All these BIP110ers are way too focused on what Bitcoin is at this exact moment, and arenโt looking at what it may look like in the future as more of the global population gets onboard
๐ค1