Well put, if I could extend it a bit further:

Fiat cannot contain energy through time due to inflation of base unit. As we drift further from its point of origin, it becomes progressively less capable of producing durable truth, because the construction of time itself requires energy to be committed into memory. Without that thermodynamic anchor, records persist symbolically but not causally.

In that sense, fiat does not simply misprice reality, it loses the ability to measure it. The further we travel from its genesis, the weaker its temporal coherence becomes. What we are living through is not just monetary instability, but a breakdown in time measurement within the system itself, alongside the emergence of a new reference: Bitcoin as an empirical fractal of the universal structure through which energy becomes memory and history.

The system is not “lying” in the conventional sense; it has lost the capacity to measure. The real distortion sits deeper in the grammar, logic, and rhetoric that precede the system and shape how reality is interpreted before it is ever recorded.

🧡 Completely understandable, it’s a real investment of time.

We’re working on a much shorter piece that should be far more digestible, one that brings the underlying message forward without requiring all the technical depth of the full paper.

There’s also a much larger story within the paper sitting behind my response here and behind why we’ve arrived at these conclusions. This story really needs its own space and proper framing.

I totally agree here. Fiat is a corruption of the base grammar, logic, and rhetoric from which science and knowledge emerge. When the underlying system of accounting is unbounded and discretionary, thought itself loses its anchor. Reasoning detaches from consequence, language drifts from structure, and disciplines begin operating on symbols that no longer resolve back to physical reality.

The result is both economic and epistemic confusion. Knowledge struggles to cohere when the substrate beneath it does not enforce coherence, when commitments can be revised and truth is not required to pass through irreversible cost.

What is required to resolve fiat is an entirely different school of thought and instantiation, one in fractal harmony with the universal structure in which energy becomes durable truth in the form of time and memory.

Bitcoin provides that base grammar. Not the fiat interpretation layered on top, but the structure itself: boundedness, thermodynamic cost, irreversible state change, and convergence on a single ordered history. If one is not thinking from within that grammar, then the reasoning still proceeds from the wrong chain.

This process is not confined to the machine. The mind must align with the instantiation. Bitcoin is both a system and a discipline, a structure that pulls thought, language, and action back into correspondence with a world where energy resolves into time, memory, and durable truth.

This is the mission we are beginning to build @nprofile1q...

Thank you! This paper was written with the guidance of someone who thought through a similar lens here.

Bitcoin has always been our linguistic anchor for transcribing between what were once separate domains of spirit/theology and math/engineering (my domain)

We found the frequency, it’s called Bitcoin.

Who else could hold the lantern?

I have not read yet, and I won’t forget you. We are working on developing the first update from the Bitcoin Lens.

I think this update will help clarify and guide you further in what we are trying to say. Once that is released I will dig in! I’m hoping to release an update by tomorrow.

I plan to work on building a community too, so our communication and collaboration can be more structured. Seems @HiveTalk may be the candidate for this. Not sure yet. Let me know if you have any structure in mind. Nick and I are learning as we go here.

Are these measurements of the field occurring at the scale of one singular Planck block of time? or are the occuring over a large multiple of blocks producing the behavior of a wave?

Seemingly continuous ≠ actually continuous.

There is only the block.

🫡 🧡 Thank you, it’s actually incredible!

Let the resonance and frequency guide you, for bitcoin answers what the base unit of all frequency must be!

Share what you can see in whatever language you can produce, you may just influence the next person ready for the message!

I’ve sent to @PlebNick as well. Being pulled in every direction currently, need to be hyper efficient with time 😵‍💫

We will read and get back to you! You have been on the radar sir 🫡

I can only hope your work now awakens others. This is a decentralized process in occurrence!

On my list to read!