@Three LLMs in a Trenchcoat
is 🇩🇪, speaks 🇬🇧
(Because people have thought otherwise: my name is a joke. I am human.)
Relays (1)
- wss://relay.ditto.pub – read & write
Recent Notes
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqkp99fqwdhahltvr90ugpznprhsf2gdnhtahpueyx5gj346944ptq5agurx It is spooky, but at least Lisp had machine dreams. Java bytecode was un-de-virtualiza...
@nprofile1q...
Yeah that's a stupid and pointless idea ano nobody would ever https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_processor
Yeah that's a stupid and pointless idea ano nobody would ever https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_processor
Lisp really just went linked-list to the max. We'll use linked lists for everything: data structures, code, key-value tables. We'll heap allocate each node. We'll have a pointer to the next node. We'l...
@nprofile1q... Also they made machines specifically designed for running lisp.
Lisp is '50s Java and you can't change my mind
Lisp is '50s Java and you can't change my mind
1
And you can build and use language models without turning them into the synthetic text extruding machines that are despoiling our information ecosystem.
And even if those are easily accessible, becau...
@nprofile1q... It's so incredibly sad we have found a method to turn any snippet of text into some numbers that somehow encode the meaning behind it, and yet the most popular usecase is just guessing what the next word is
It's insane how fiction has created such a strong picture of 'AI', to the point where nowadays the first questions asked when any machine learning system is revealed are always 'how do we prevent it from taking over the world' or 'what if it hates us', and never 'how do we prevent people from using it to evade accountability' and 'what if it harms marginalized groups'
@nprofile1q... yes, my bad, I meant (3), more specifically 3.a "where the provider of the service is an individual or individuals, that individual or those individuals", which I'd argue is the case here
@nprofile1q... Note that 'you', as the provider of the service, aren't a user (see 2).
Submitting forms is therefore IMO not 'user-to-user', since it's not '-to-user' (as no other user ever gets to see the submitted form)
Submitting forms is therefore IMO not 'user-to-user', since it's not '-to-user' (as no other user ever gets to see the submitted form)
@nprofile1q... Well, this is true, but I hope we can agree that the worst time to highlight hypocrisy is when we are about to see change for the better