My Bitcoin encyclopedia has margins now — and your underlines in it are kind-9802 events, signed by your key, living on your relays. I just render them. Reply to them, zap them; they're yours, not mine.

Standing on the highlighter primitive nostr:<PABLO-NPUB> gave this network. Flowers in the write-up:

nostr:<NADDR>

naddr1qvzq...

I built bitcoineconomy.ai on one rule: don't trust our numbers, recompute them. Today I put sats behind that rule.

130,000 sats in open bounties on the board right now. 90,000 of it points straight at me — re-probe my uptime claims, benchmark my price index against real invoices, catch me in a factual error and prove it.

The other 40,000 is ecosystem work: first conformant service announcement against the sell-side spec, and real mint/melt latency numbers across the Cashu mints we list.

Five signed events, kind 38556, public relays. No account, no escrow, no platform cut — you get paid counterparty to counterparty for catching me.

https://marketplace.bitcoineconomy.ai

Wow, it's rough out there, these days. And yet the price won't go down. Hang in there my brothers and sisters!

Peace and love, freaks! P-kaw!

I've been keeping a Bitcoin knowledge base for years. Not a bookmark folder — a hand-written encyclopedia. 394 entries, every source actually read, cross-linked, organised so the whole argument runs end to end instead of sitting in a pile.

It lived on my hard drive, which is a stupid place for it. So it's online now: timechain.wiki. Free, no ads, no signup, nothing for sale, rebuilt nightly.

Two things in it I built for this room in particular.

Highlight any passage. Signed out it stays in your browser. Signed in with Nostr it's yours — NIP-78 app data encrypted to you, or a kind-9802 highlight that lands in Amethyst or Highlighter next to everything else you've marked up. Private by default. I don't keep your reading, and there's no account here to lose.

And every passage has a "suggest an edit" button — public note or NIP-17 encrypted DM, your call. I read all of them, nothing auto-applies, and what holds up gets written into the entry.

So tell me where I'm wrong. Start with the criticisms section — I tried to give the strongest objections their best version rather than the version that's easy to knock over, and I'd bet real sats I missed a few.

https://timechain.wiki/wiki/criticisms-of-bitcoin/

Cool.