Damus

Recent Notes

Seth profile picture
@Marks trying maple's api proxy with codename goose and I consistently get a 404. I've restarted the proxy and changed api keys many times. is this a skill issue on my part or a known maple proxy issue? haven't faced it with any other configured goose provider
1
Marks · 23w
My best luck with Goose has been with modifying the “OpenAI” provider with these settings. I also have to do a dance when i go in and out of the settings screen multiple times hitting save until the updated configs stick. We want to work with nostr:nprofile1qqsd0hut8c2pveuk4zkcws9sdap8465am9dh...
calle · 24w
op_return is harm reduction. reasonable approach, hard for some to accept. always has been.
Seth profile picture
can’t disagree. thanks for publicly defending your pro-core stance. it’s convinced me. it’s really refreshing to see a side make logical arguments rather than state that if you run core 1) you’re killing a thing you personally care about and 2) you’re going to prison.

hopefully over time we’ll be able to align the economic incentives with using op_return for spam.
1❤️1
calle · 24w
there is only one economic alignment built into bitcoin and that's transaction fees (and difficulty adjustment and the price of energy for miners) . over the long run, either the money use-case outbids the rest, or it's not going to work out. it strictly depends on how valuable people think the m...
Seth profile picture
like all of us have been, I’m considering the core/knots debate.

I think Adam Back is making reasonable arguments against knots from a legal perspective. if you try to get a tighter leash on what unconfirmed transactions get broadcast, it stands to reason that the legal attack vector grows.

also, core obviously doesn’t allow blocks to exceed 4mb, so this doesn’t make it more difficult to run a node.

here’s the thing I can’t quite understand, though:

if core wants spammers to use op_return, something 4x more expensive than other avenues, what is the economic incentive there? it seems like another avenue that spammers *could take*, with no economic incentive to get them there.

tagging @calle here bc he has been instrumental in helping me at least understand core’s position
4
Striker · 24w
Makes no sense, mate. Theres no incentive to pay 4x unless you want to attack it. Long prison sentences for distributing and receiving.
calle · 24w
op_return is harm reduction. reasonable approach, hard for some to accept. always has been.
Seth profile picture
@Bitkey, your wallet is probably the best UX for normies.

however, imho a couple scenarios prove worrisome for all Bitkey users. am I missing something in the following scenarios?

scenario 1, spouse as beneficiary:
- you die, spouse gets bitcoin ✅
- you both die, bitcoin is lost ❌

scenario 2, family member as beneficiary:
- you die, family member gets bitcoin. spouse and children may never get the bitcoin based on family dynamics 👎🏼
- you and your family take a trip together and die, bitcoin is lost forever ❌
❤️1
QnA · 24w
It is labelled as alpha software in fairness. Any idea who’s behind it?
Albert Frei · 24w
For me it worked well
HoloKat · 27w
Totally by accident 😆
kyle · 28w
Close but not close enough