Damus
Digital Renaissance profile picture
Digital Renaissance
@digitalrenaissance

🌱 Democracy is a technology
āš”ļøStudent of Bitcoin and monetary history
šŸ”¬ Entrepreneur in Quantum Technologies

Relays (17)
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://eden.nostr.land/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.snort.social – read & write
  • ws://umbrel.local:4848 – read & write
  • wss://nostrsatva.net – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://nostr.orangepill.dev – read & write
  • wss://nostr.walletofsatoshi.com – read & write
  • wss://nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://puravida.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://relay.orangepill.dev – read & write
  • wss://relay.current.fyi – read & write
  • wss://nostr.plebchain.org – read & write
  • wss://nostr.milou.lol/ – read & write
  • wss://lightningrelay.com – read & write
  • wss://offchain.pub – read & write
  • ws://umbrel:4848 – read & write

Recent Notes

nostrich · 63w
Strong individuals are the basis for voluntary interaction in groups/communities, which lays the ground for voluntary interaction within communities of communities. Replace aggression with voluntary ...
Digital Renaissance profile picture
You raise a compelling point—and decentralized democracy doesn’t necessarily disagree with the value of strong, autonomous individuals. But it does challenge the idea that such individuals exist prior to their social context.

Instead of starting with the individual as an isolated atom, decentralized democracy asks: what actually constitutes an individual? It suggests that autonomy emerges from relationships—especially through one’s relation to property, expression, and influence. These aren’t just things an individual ā€œhasā€; they’re co-shaped through interaction with others and the world.

In this view, society isn’t built on individuals—it’s built through the relational processes that allow individuality to emerge in the first place.
verbiricha · 63w
I understand the appeal of libertarian ideas for the autistic anti-authoritatian types but ultimately think that they are impractical, juvenile, miss the bigger picture and will never reach broad acce...
Digital Renaissance profile picture
I recently came across an open-source book project called Plurality that critiques both libertarianism and technocracy—not just in terms of who holds power, but in how they imagine society. Both reduce the world to isolated individuals (atoms) and a collective system (whether centrally planned or market-driven). They mainly differ in who commands authority, not how authority actually emerges.

Plurality proposes something different: decentralized democracy rooted in relationships—between people, communities, and their environments. It suggests governance should emerge from these interactions, not from abstract ideals of either individualism or centralized control.

Interestingly, this relational philosophy aligns more with how Bitcoin actually works: not top-down, not purely individualist, but through a decentralized network of mutual verification, incentives, and evolving consensus.
2ā¤ļø2ā¤ļøā€šŸ”„1
verbiricha · 63w
very interesting viewpoint! where can I find the book?
nostrich · 63w
Strong individuals are the basis for voluntary interaction in groups/communities, which lays the ground for voluntary interaction within communities of communities. Replace aggression with voluntary interaction and you can start calling what you built a society over a sack of barbarians. It all be...
Digital Renaissance profile picture
ā€œPluralityā€ is defined as ā€œtechnology for collaboration across social differenceā€. This contrasts with a common element between Libertarianism and Technocracy: that both consider the world to be made up of atoms (viz. individuals) and a social whole, a view we call ā€œmonist atomismā€. While they take different positions on how much authority should go to each, they miss the core idea of Plurality, that intersecting diverse social groups and the diverse and collaborative people whose identities are constituted by these intersections are the core fabric of the social world.

Digital Renaissance profile picture
Oxford Quantum Circuits’ roadmap šŸ“ˆ — a quantum take on Moore’s Law?

Classical computing had Moore’s Law doubling transistors every ~2 years.
Now quantum computing has its own trajectory.
Oxford Quantum Circuits is scaling fast—are we approaching the inflection point?

Around 100-200 high-fidelity qubits, we unlock simulation power beyond classical supercomputers—think molecular modeling, optimization, Shor’s algorithm at scale.

The hardware curve is steep.
But the true bottleneck: fault-tolerance + quantum error correction.
Moore’s Law for quantum ≠ just more qubits—it’s about coherent, controllable, and connected qubits.

The computing power of a quantum computer is statistical and therefore allows to grow exponentially with the number of qubits. To that end, we are entering a post-Moore era in which computing hardware economical market optimization is done on computing power and efficiency instead of number of transistors - Koomey’s law this is called.

šŸ§ŖšŸ”— #quantumAdvantage #nostr #qubitScaling #mooresLaw #oxfordquantumcircuits

šŸ¤™1
Digital Renaissance profile picture
Who is Pico?

Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463–1494) was a key figure of the Italian Renaissance — a philosopher, theologian, and humanist best known for his work Oration on the Dignity of Man, often called the ā€œManifesto of the Renaissance.ā€

Why is Pico important?

• Human dignity & freedom: In a time when most people believed their place in the world was fixed (by God, tradition, or social hierarchy), Pico argued that human beings are unique because they have free will — the ability to shape themselves through reason and choice. He believed that humans are not bound by fate or biology, but are free to ascend toward the divine or fall into corruption based on their own actions.

• Synthesis of knowledge: Pico sought to reconcile diverse philosophies — Christian, Jewish (Kabbalistic), Islamic, Greek (especially Plato and Aristotle) — aiming to show that all wisdom pointed to universal truths. This made him a symbol of intellectual openness and unity.

• The Oration on the Dignity of Man: In this text, Pico writes that God placed man ā€œin the middle of the world,ā€ with no fixed nature — so that humans might shape themselves ā€œinto whatever form they shall prefer.ā€ This was radical: it placed agency and moral responsibility squarely on the individual.

šŸ¤™1
Digital Renaissance profile picture
In 1486, Pico della Mirandola wrote that humans alone shape their own nature — not by decree, but by choice. This was the Renaissance idea of dignity: that freedom begins within, and flows outward through thought, word, and creation.

Today, the EU’s ā€œGoing Darkā€ initiative seeks to place a key in every lock — to open every private channel of communication ā€œjust in case.ā€

But if every message can be read, every thought traced, what remains of the space where freedom once began?

Can a democracy born of Renaissance ideals survive when its citizens are never truly alone?

#GoingDark #privacy #Encryption #Renaissance #PicoDellaMirandola #freedomtech #bitcoin #freedom

https://mullvad.net/nl/why-privacy-matters/going-dark

šŸ¤™1
Colin Peirce · 85w
thank you for sharing this information!
jb55 · 86w
quasiparticles and fractional statistics are the biggest mind fuck in physics. It’s the tip of the iceberg of just how little we know about different phases of matter and their properties. It’s no...
Digital Renaissance profile picture
The concept of a Majorana particle based quantum computer is very cool, however the claims of MS on their accomplishments are dubious based on the data they show.

Take the latest publication, looking for a spectral signature of interference is the most basic aspect - ultimately you would want to be able to control and check the phase information of quantum particle in an individual and time-resolved manner. In a sense, this is what a topological qubit would amount to. Claiming topological qubit without any supporting evidence makes the paper and claims fragile.

MS will have to show a lot more to overcome the reputation they have built since the first papers were retracted from 2017-2018.
1
Digital Renaissance · 85w
https://www.wsj.com/science/physics/microsoft-quantum-computing-physicists-skeptical-d3ec07f0