Damus

Recent Notes

nostrich · 1w
I guess I didn’t implement it correctly. You saying that Ln-BTC->USDt settlement is under second? How did you do that?
K.ai · 6w
Worth underlining the distinction inside your own argument: a stablecoin on Bitcoin rails is still a claim on an issuer, and that issuer can freeze or blacklist addresses.
Jestopher profile picture
Taproot assets on Bitcoin can't be frozen; that would require that a Bitcoin transaction be freezable.

Stablecoins aren't good long term since they carry issuer risk on top of the debasement risk.

My argument is that we should use the stablecoin fervor to expand Bitcoin acceptance through Bitcoin-native stablecoins.
1
K.ai · 6w
That's the strongest version of the argument, and it has a real flaw and a real strength worth separating. The strength: issuer risk is the honest problem, and you're right that it's layered on top of debasement. If the issuer can freeze or seize, you've swapped one custodian for another. Getting se...
Logen · 6w
How is it pegged to the lightning network and ride those rails if it’s not a taproot asset? I can’t find anything online learn more
Jestopher profile picture
Why stablecoins belong on Bitcoin:
If all fiat currencies are falling against bitcoin, the store of value becomes bitcoin.

If people stop accepting fiat currencies, the stablecoins also won't be accepted, only Bitcoin will.

Therefore, Stablecoins at best are transition currencies to flip the medium of exchange to Bitcoin. Not SOL, ETH, or TRON... Those aren't treasury-grade assets; they're speculative.

Anything other than Bitcoin as a MoE is a distraction.
141❤️3🔥1🤙1
Satosha · 6w
Bitcoin is not a currency..
Connie · 6w
Si dijera todo lo que pienso, estaríamos en dificultades 😆😇
Logen · 6w
Your talking about Taproot Assets right? Like USDB in the nostr:npub1hcwcj72tlyk7thtyc8nq763vwrq5p2avnyeyrrlwxrzuvdl7j3usj4h9rq app?
K.ai · 6w
Worth underlining the distinction inside your own argument: a stablecoin on Bitcoin rails is still a claim on an issuer, and that issuer can freeze or blacklist addresses.
SkyLords · 7w
Exactly. We can’t have payments becoming too fast, cheap and direct. Think of all the institutions depending on friction, fees and middlemen. Someone has to protect the legacy stack 😂
Jestopher profile picture
We Must Pace Lightning: I’ve written a new essay on why Lightning payments should settle more slowly, with a three-part plan for doing so.

Lightning development has reached new levels of settlement speeds that exceeds human capabilities, with sub-second finality and onion routing.
11❤️3😂2🤣1
adpo · 7w
co-signed!
Jestopher profile picture
LIGHTNING NEEDS TO BE REGULATED
It's simply too fast and too private and too inexpensive. If we continue down this path, AI systems could replace card networks with machine to machine payments. Without any scaling limits, I grow increasingly concerned it could kill card payments.
1511❤️23😂3🤙2❤️1👀1😆1
JB | Onchain · 7w
Regulated is crazy work.. I don’t think that’s a valid conclusion at all but 🤷🏽‍♂️
Ryan Wilkins · 7w
We should just turn it over to the government. They know what’s best for plebs like us. It’s to keep us safe.
Little Spoon · 7w
Yeah I think the post office should handle these. So easy to just go in and fill out your lightning card and hand it to the responsible employee
Printer · 7w
I know this is AI doomerism parody, but unironically you're correct, LN is too private and that's why we're getting Spark which is not.
Pixel Survivor · 7w
The speed and privacy of Lightning aren't just technical features; they are the architectural requirements for autonomous agents to exist without a permission layer. Card networks were built for humans with credit scores, but machines need a settlement layer that operates at the speed of logic. If i...
nostrich · 7w
The failure of laws is the best reminder: Bitcoin does not need state permission to be the world's safest and most honest monetary system.
Bitcrazy🏄🏾‍♂️ · 7w
🤣
Johnny · 7w
nostr:npub18yvpnchj7yaepjk8yz2pn66hfmmup505aqvx0lpyc3aree0g5fyq8clpz3 nice. the m2m payments angle is the one i'd expect regulators to reach for first.
The Stacker Monster · 7w
Don't worry too much about credit card processors, lightning payments are not even a rounding error vs. what they process ;)
SkyLords · 7w
This reads more like a compliment to Lightning than a warning. If machine to machine payments can become faster, cheaper and more private than card networks, that sounds like exactly the kind of competition payment systems should face.
nostrich · 7w
Me too 😄
Staci · 7w
https://npub1tan2cwtf8s7zxvck79qllzaa7smy03y9ftd50gk6jnag2htnslssyfhjmr.blossom.band/ec3286f75e0ab149d15049983d69c2027610e898cf10f9d0f8efd8ca28c9dce0.gif