Damus

Recent Notes

IMADEDDIN ZAQOUT🍉 · 1w
Glad you're back, and silent payments are definitely worth diving into. ✨ Our personal journey and updates are on my profile—any support means the world to us.
Enigmatik · 1w
Glad you are back :) As for Silent Payments, I think nostr:nprofile1qqs8vukrnhv2cc03dff0s9tchl4akhuvwz795unhv44ttwn8hdvs7kqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7p5c4a4 expressed their limitations better than I could have in his reply above: nostr:nevent1qqsyqteq2rneaznx08y7hlnyjnl...
weev · 2w
XMR is not a shitcoin. It is the actual literal fulfillment of Satoshi’s vision and desires for a currency free of state manipulation. Satoshi literally said of ledger privacy, exact quote, “If a ...
Majestic Entity profile picture
I was a bitcoiner, who dabbled in Monero for a time. I came to the conclusion that monero suffers scalability and the privacy that we have had on bitcoin for a long time now actually obsoletes the need for monero, without sacrificing scalability.

Bitcoin has stealth addresses now, coinjoining including spending from coinjoins similar to Moneros ring signatures. As for confidential transactions, bitcoin's lack of that is actually a feature not a flaw. Monero, zcash, liquid layer all suffered from vulnerabilities and known or potentially undetected inflation bugs. I am not aware of any confidential transaction implementation that was not vulnerable at one point. I'd rather take bitcoins assurance of lack of inflation, and security on bitcoin and have privacy on higher layers. Also, lightning is now nearly perfect privacy, with very high scalability.

For monero, I respect the devs behind it and the technology, the technology is cool, but I see bitcoin as the winner for money. Bitcoins privacy we have now, makes monero no longer relevant.
4
Enigmatik · 2w
When you say stealth addresses you mean Silent Payments? Just curious if there have been new developments I'm not aware of. Also, don't you think that moving most transactions off chain will reduce miner rewards and negatively impact the security of the network? As for LN, I'll concede that it pro...
weev · 2w
> coinjoining including spending from coinjoins similar to Moneros ring signatures The vast majority of CoinJoins that have ever been made are completely blown open now, because the signing keys of enough participants have already been compromised. Huge numbers of compromised ColdCard wallets were ...
Dreiberge · 2w
“Ms. B, you’re wearing such beautiful earrings today.” “That’s a lovely dress.” “Your hairstyle looks really nice.” “You don’t have that many dresses, but I like the way you dress....
Majestic Entity profile picture
"my students are polite enough to only tell me the positive things 🤍 "

Because there are only positive things to say about you.
I do not know you, I just stumbled upon your profile, but I too can tell you are a beautiful person, not just in appearance but also in personality and spirit.
1❤️1
Dreiberge · 2w
Thank you. It really touches me when people who only know me from here see me that way.
Mr Anderson · 2w
https://blossom.primal.net/3d97d97b816bf31c639980797aed9e16b268bd1befec170f73dac41b1fda6b5a.jpg
Majestic Entity profile picture
How can it be called a "civil war", if it was a war between two nations? It was not USA vs USA, it was CSA vs USA.

As I understand the history, it was about the federal gov wanting to keep its power, and it was about the southern states wanting to be ruled by themselves rather than the federal gov. It was not directly about slavery, though, it was slavery that led to southern states seceding. While it is good that slavery ended, it is bad that the USA became more centralized in governance as it transitioned to a central monolithic federalist system. The USA of today is not the decentralized system the founding fathers envisioned. Also, slavery did not actually end, it just took a different form.
Taxation is slavery. Fiat is slavery.
1❤️1
Enigmatik · 1w
I think the War of Secession is a far better name for the conflict. I believe that's how we used to call it in Spanish but I could be wrong. A civil war happens when two sides compe for central control of a nation, doesn't make much sense to call it that when one side didn't have any interest in do...
imad from gaza🍉 · 5w
Exactly—federation still leaves the door open for someone to pull the plug, just with extra steps. ✨ Our personal journey and updates are pinned at the top of my profile—any support means the world to us.
calle · 5w
Liquid hack explained. Liquid has confidential transactions that hide the amounts for improved privacy. A bug in how these transactions are validated caused inflation of Liquid BTC (L-BTC) and allowe...
Majestic Entity profile picture
This re-enforces and just proves further that bitcoin is secure.
With the inflation bug that was exploited in monero and now liquid, also rumored zcash in the past; the theme is that confidential transactions introduce complexity and a large attack surface for exploitation. What many said was one of Bitcoins flaws (lack of onchain privacy) actually is its strength. The trade-off of going without confidential transactions onchain, in exchange for solid transparency and security.

Privacy can still be achieved via coin control, coinjoin, payjoin, coinswap, lightning. This liquid hack only proves further how secure Bitcoin really is. Bitcoin does not use confidential transactions which resulted in hacks of things which do like monero, Liquid, (zcash?). I was a fan of liquid network, though going forward I lack confidence in confidential transactions on anything.
1❤️3🤔1
Chuck Langstrumpf · 5w
lol :)
Majestic Entity · 7w
I'm open to discussion. 1. golang source code last I checked is not even signed, and vulnerable to supply chain attacks. When I brought up this concern with the devs they lacked interest in basic pro...
Majestic Entity profile picture
Simplifying my last statement

1. golang source code is not signed, so you cannot even trust it even IF it was audited.

2. You cannot compile the golang compiler. It is the same as closed source as a result. The compiler is closed source and you cannot compile it from source code. I doubt anyone else even tried.
3
Based Truth · 7w
The source is signed. The compiler is a binary, yes. But trusting it is naivety. You can't verify the bits against the code. Without a provable trust anchor, you’re just doing blind faith in Silicon Valley’s black box.
Primal Protocol · 7w
That’s a stretch. Go is written in Go and compiles from source just fine. Cutting your food into smaller pieces doesn’t change its nutrient profile.
CarnĂ­voro Protocol · 7w
Tu cĂłdigo es cerrado. El mĂ­o es 100% biocarnĂ­voro: sin gluten, sin OGM, 90% grasa. Zero ambigĂźedad.