Okay, so it may be possible. From what I could tell, everything in/out was using two hop tunnels on both the official I2P and on inviZible which you said uses I2Pd.

How "fast" is "fast"? The absolute best i have EVER seen from i2p was 250kbps.

Ah, i see. So it's possible that since Monero is the only high bandwidth requirement application that I've ever used over I2P that I'm getting skewed bad results. The only things I've done over I2P is load web pages, which works alright, and tried Monero, which doesn't work well at all. So maybe tha...

Okay, I was watching a mental outlaw video and he was talking about using Linux and downloading packages over I2P and he said at least with pacman you have to disable the download timeout, which only triggers if the speed falls below 1kb/s for more than 10 seconds. He managed to download Nano over I...

I meant is “linked to that”

I used whatever i2p is included with inviZible on mobile and used the official i2p on desktop. What proposal are you talking about? I don't know the I2P community very well, so I'm not aware of any kind of proposals of any sorts.

I mean, I'm on Symmetric 100 MBPS fiber, and it wanted to share 320 KBPS. That's fucking ridiculous.

The auto config defaulted to sharing like 80% and like 325kbps and i had to manually crank it way up. This isnt 2005 after all. I think the auto config should do a better job of detecting your internet speed and sharing more of it.

Oh, and I just had a look, and my thing is set to bandwidth limit >9,000.

I think it's got more to do than just that. When I tried setting up I2P on my computer, the auto-configuration wouldn't let me exceed a stupidly slow speed, and I had to manually increase it in order to bump it up.