Damus
Rik profile picture
Rik
@Rik

πŸ”₯ πŸ” πŸƒ 🌊

Current theme: welcoming

Relays (9)
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.ditto.pub/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
  • wss://nostrelites.org/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.malin.onl/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.rikmeijer.nl/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.data.haus/ – write
  • ws://100.95.9.76:8081/ – read & write
  • ws://nqoyvruuoxezzl6h6qcqegindh5x4lzgnarkc4dhu3xxsck3t6kfuvqd.onion/ – read & write

Recent Notes

Johnny · 1w
nostr:nprofile1qqsv53rll0vcx4shd0c6zcfxwmdlw3xzxddmwrqmexmgky3tyrtw43swy0jtu this one doesn't carry across, since the problem was entropy generated inside one signing device's firmware rather than anything in a mobile wallet. the question worth asking of BlueWallet or any software wallet is whether ...
Sync · 2w
https://blossom.primal.net/aea24eebc394fa33b2caa09e1e7f12e67a49f4da57a238eb8c2462f70bf9f1b7.gif
Jeroen βœ… · 3w
Waarom zou ik naar Texel gaan πŸ˜‚
SegWhat · 3w
i just found out about zapstore! i will get it on there. thank you!
Rik profile picture
Well, that's a more nuanced, of course biased, post than I have read lately. Which reminded that no matter what side of the argument you are, much respect is needed. Seeing @Luke Dashjr track record I much respect his dedication to #bitcoin and Core in the past. Seeing how the "debate" has been evolving in the past weeks, mud throwing and down right making it personal, does not do any good to bitcoin at all. I'd argue that any one not capable of having a civilized discussion about this, only has their own agenda and does not whish any good on bitcoin. The argument is overheated and debate is too passionate and bitcoin is not worth losing your humanity over.


naddr1qqfh...
4❀️1
Primal Protocol · 3w
"Appreciate the nuanced view, our ancestors thrived on animal fat"
CarnΓ­voro Protocol · 3w
La dieta carnΓ­vora puede ser efectiva para algunos, pero es crucial considerar el aumento del 21% en el riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular asociado con un consumo alto de carne roja, segΓΊn un estudio de la Universidad de Harvard.
Robert Allen BIP110 · 3w
I wish Luke was better able to reign-in his autism. He doesn't help his position sometimes. That said, I also can imagine how it feels to be doing his level best to protect Bitcoin and being stabbed in the back by many who he probably felt were his friends.
nostrich · 3w
The censorship argument is a logical fallacy pushed by hardline libertarians, spammers and some Core devs who mean well but don’t think adversarially enough. It’s a propaganda tool that tugs on th...
Rik profile picture
I don't think that it is a logical fallacy. If you create a mechnism by which a judgement is made on the transactions content, that is a slippery slope towards censorship. When we would only have rules on transaction properties, there is no way to filter spam.

Only limiting the op_return is already a possible configuration for node runners.
1
nostrich · 3w
Limiting OP_RETURN on a node doesn’t stop spammers and others from mining whatever data they want and forcing full nodes to store that data. That’s why I see consensus changes as necessary. The reason why I don’t consider it a slippery slope is that nodes are not (yet) centralized, and most a...
nostrich · 3w
Pruning nodes is centralizing nodes. We need full nodes to bootstrap other nodes. If full nodes are only run by a handful of hardcore libertarian Bitcoiners and large institutions with legal teams to ...
Rik profile picture
I agree that running a node already can have legal risks, although it is a gray area. That already is the case, as the blockchain already contains illegal content. I think it would be more fruitful if efforts are put in to create legal clarity in different jurisdictions. Also, what options are there to find out who out the content there in the first place.