Damus
Open in Damus
Anjhc profile picture
Anjhc
@Anjhc

Working on:
https://web.nostrord.com/
https://formastr.com/
npub1lm93678pyyxxdta28lyjaq4pyfps6cqpk9y04w3seu4wfeh6alesnzwwz2
npub10j5hz4l6l9ea6u2nut0r66v5d07lsqjaj4jl80sf0phyanaduefsnkc4cn

npub1f27g79lrpey73wtqa2pprn7vv3yveyytws08lxqe7pn0yuj8ppyqyk9swunpub
[email protected]nip05
[email protected]lnurl
Relays (5)
  • wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/ – read & write
  • wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.mom/ – read & write

Recent Notes

Ingwie Phoenix (aka. birb) · 4d
Neat! https://blossom.primal.net/60554576d436cb6d8435322581ad37ec38f8cd6d88535d3518925659aae4fbf0.png So it's "single channel" and not like a full-on community messenger - more like IRC? I saw that it sent an event with `/join` x)
fiatjaf · 4d
No, it would be a waste of time because each relay might have a completely different form, it might require some weird form of login before a group is created, it might only allow forms to be created in a full moon etc. That's what I want and expect, at least. But groups.fiatjaf.com is an old aban...
idsera · 4d
Haha
Dune Messias · 4d
GM!
fiatjaf · 1w
I don't know, it looks like the nostrconnect:// URI is still missing the "secret" parameter, and now the bunker:// isn't working either (it loads forever, apparently doesn't try to contact the bunker) so I couldn't try.
fiatjaf · 2w
This is beautiful, I like it a lot.
fiatjaf · 2w
I don't know. I think we shouldn't have to join them, but if we want them to be "independent" then maybe we'll have to. Wait, I think the solution is to have a soft agreement to always have these groups as "unrestricted" (i.e. to not have the "restricted" tag in them), which is the default for when...
fiatjaf · 3w
That sounds ok to me, although what happens if a group doesn't have such tag? Should it be considered a parent by default? In that case we don't need that tag for parents. Now what if someone does a ...
 Anjhc profile picture
Anjhc @Anjhc
Yes, the root groups remain the same without the "parent" tag, it should only exist in the sub-groups, it may be interesting to use a "depth" tag to know the level of the group in the structure:

Root Group (depth = 1)
"tags": [
["d", "tech"],
["name", "Tech"],
["depth", "1"],
]

Subgroup (depth = 2)
"tags": [
["d", "nostr"],
["name", "Nostr"],
["parent", "tech"],
["depth", "2"],
]

Sub-subgroup (depth = 3)
"tags": [
["d", "nip29"],
["name", "NIP-29"],
["parent", "nostr"],
["depth", "3"],
]
1
fiatjaf · 3w
Looks good to me.
fiatjaf · 3w
That sounds ok to me, although what happens if a group doesn't have such tag? Should it be considered a parent by default? In that case we don't need that tag for parents. Now what if someone does a sub-sub-group?
Girino Vey! · 3w
vou procurar!