Damus
Owen Gregory profile picture
Owen Gregory
@OwenG4now

The universe is neutral, people are not. Issues rarely simple, progress rarely difficult. Thinking is deliberate.

Relays (7)
  • wss://eden.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social – read & write
  • wss://relay.bitcoinpark.com – read & write
  • wss://bitcoinmaximalists.online – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write

Recent Notes

Leo Wandersleb · 16h
Let's hang you and let god sort out if that was a good idea? What will god tell the henchmen? Good or bad? How many good people may you kill to not get into trouble for killing bad people?
Owen Gregory profile picture
Followon correction:

If by association, I put myself in question, that’s a risk I willing take. Nothing is black and white, there is a less than clearly defined “grey” area. I admit not necessarily getting the absolute most possible, avoiding that area, though have no sympathy for THOSE CLOSE BUT NOT QUITE the likes of Milken, Madoff, SBF for getting hung and the Finks yet to come. Are you fucking done or in need of further schooling?! I said it was “tongue-in-cheek. Take your last shot, I won’t return fire. Bring it.
Leo Wandersleb · 16h
Let's hang you and let god sort out if that was a good idea? What will god tell the henchmen? Good or bad? How many good people may you kill to not get into trouble for killing bad people?
Owen Gregory profile picture
If by association, I put myself in question, that’s a risk I willing take. Nothing is black and white, there is a less than clearly defined “grey” area. I admit not necessarily getting the absolute most possible, avoiding that area, though have no sympathy for the likes of Milken, Madoff, SBF for getting hung and the Finks yet to come. Are you fucking done or in need of further schooling?! I said it was “tongue-in-cheek. Take your last shot, I won’t return fire. Bring it.
Owen Gregory profile picture
note1s74cc...
Owen Gregory profile picture
Honestly, I don’t think that deeply about it, I don’t have decades to sit for the next cycle and play it conservative (Always have though and it’s served me well—never take on what I can’t manage).
If I was younger knowing what Iknow now? Well, I’m too smart to even entertain THAT thought. Cheers, 🍻.
note1mxvqe...
Owen Gregory profile picture
Agree, to some degree personally, yet there are some RoD’s that have never (that I’m aware of) contradicted themselves without owning up that I’m am loyal to. I don’t get the same vibe from Saylor.

I don’t cry over what could have been unless the topic is our ZOG, then I revert to the “Serenity Prayer.” 🤣
note1rlxcy...
Owen Gregory profile picture
He’s a basically a fund manager. He’s not giving ALL gains away in dividends, that’s how he makes his living, by taking a little cut from investors—I would expect him to be prudent.
Remember his “entities” own MOST of the Bitcoin, not Saylor. Don’t know how much he owns, don’t care. He couldn’t have done what he’s done without OPM. In a sense, he’s hedged his bet and is no friend of Bitcoin.
Owen Gregory profile picture
No, because Saylor’s use of Bitcoin, as a security, is not what it was intended for, though he has a right to do so.
No again because he has “outperformed” Bitcoin during a specific (and limited) time window. It’s impossible long-term to outperform Bitcoin using Bitcoin.
One Bitcoin = One Bitcoin, “if and only if” you hold the keys, in this case Saylor (or his formed entities) does. You have no guarantee he won’t rug you, none.
To perform as well as Bitcoin you must own Bitcoin—period.
5