Damus

Recent Notes

j'ai les clés · 131w
Plz ELI5 Why would the real value of savings decrease when an economy’s productivity stagnates or declines? I don’t follow this, especially in a global market for goods & services.
Semi-Normal profile picture
In the same way that monetary scarcity increases what can be purchased with that money, scarcity of goods increases the amount of money those goods can "buy".

If you save when goods are plentiful, and attempt to spend when goods are scarce, you will find that your "real" purchasing power has likely declined.

The Daniel 🖖 · 131w
It’s still legal tender, but that’s the last dollar I’ll ever hold.
Mike Brock · 131w
My point is the temporal nature of savings is a social construct. Even with sound money, it's not a perfect proxy for the availability of capital, nor does it account for capital depreciation across t...
Semi-Normal profile picture
Completely agree with this. To over simplify... the % of the money you want to spend now roughly equates to the % of the stuff that's available to buy now.

Savers increase the spending power of current spenders by reducing the amount to be spent now, producers increase (or decrease) the spending power of money being currently spent bu producing more or less goods for sale.

If available for sale goes to 0, purchasing power of money being spent goes to 0.
1
Mike Brock · 131w
So it's an ethical claim of how the world ought to be. It's not a universal objective truth of what constitutes good money.
Mike Brock · 131w
There's no such thing as an objective measurement in macroeconomics. You're always measuring from some normative frame. In other words, relative to what you think *ought* to be true about the world. ...
Semi-Normal profile picture
It's decidedly less efficient for everyone who benefits from the manipulations (possibly unpopular, but I'd argue most Americans benefit at the expense of the 3rd world).

I do think btc is objectively more fair.. participants have a much stronger expectation of being treated equally.. but to your point. Whether or not you think fairness is good is a different matter. Most would say they think fairness is important, but they betray themselves quickly by talking about who NEEDS to be excluded.
2
Mike Brock · 131w
My point is the temporal nature of savings is a social construct. Even with sound money, it's not a perfect proxy for the availability of capital, nor does it account for capital depreciation across time, relative to the production in which the savings were accumulated. You can do some basic thoug...
H.M. Murdock · 139w
I'm glad there's a solid place to go while Twitter sinks.
H.M. Murdock · 139w
How's life?
Parman - Activate OP_GFY now!! · 141w
What's the point in writing a long ass educational threads here if only two people are going to see it? Maybe I'll just use NOSTR to tell plebs to GFY? GFY.
Semi-Normal profile picture
Nostr right now is a bit too much people who have the same ideas of the world.. there's no one to argue with.

When some government gets stupid and tried to shut some bit discussion down... alot of people will probably flee to nostr, and that wave will be half insane.
❤️1🤙1