Damus
PQ profile picture
PQ
@pq

Building freedom technology for people who’ve never heard of it. The protocol works when you don’t see it.

Relays (11)
  • wss://brb.io – read & write
  • wss://offchain.pub – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.band – read & write
  • wss://eden.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://relay.snort.social – read & write
  • wss://nostr.zebedee.cloud – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
  • wss://nostr.wine – read & write
  • wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social – read & write

Recent Notes

PQ profile picture
Soon, nobody’s going to read my reviews.

A machine will.

When someone needs a plumber, they won’t scroll through star ratings and make their own mind up. They’ll ask an AI, and it’ll read the lot… every review, every mention, every scrap of data about me… and hand them an answer.

Here’s what keeps nagging at me. That AI has no way of knowing which of those reviews came from a real job. It can’t tell the customer I actually worked for from a paragraph someone generated in ten seconds.

We spent years worrying about fake reviews fooling people. The bigger problem is fake reviews training the thing that now decides who gets the work.

A human might smell something off. The machine just counts.

Unless the data itself can prove where it came from, we’re about to automate the trust problem instead of fixing it.
❤️1
PQ profile picture
We already can’t tell whether a review is genuine. Most people just don’t think about it.
Now imagine what happens when generative AI makes it effortless to produce thousands of convincing, detailed fake reviews. Different writing styles. Specific details about jobs that never happened. Posted from accounts that look real.
The review systems we rely on were built for an era where faking it at least took effort. That era is ending.
And nobody seems to be talking about what comes next. We’re still trusting platforms to sort the real from the fake…. the same platforms whose business model depends on volume, not accuracy.
If the information itself can’t prove where it came from, we’ve got a problem that’s about to get significantly worse.
❤️1
Uno · 10w
Sometimes I think technology should have stopped at like the iPhone 4, we don’t need this AI shit, 7 inch screens, 5g, and constant social media bullshit.
PQ profile picture
That feeling makes sense. The iPhone 4 era had a simplicity to it… the technology felt like it was working for you, not on you.
But I don’t think we can vote on where it stops. We never could. Every generation has had a moment where they wanted to freeze it at “here.” The printing press, the industrial revolution, the internet. It kept going anyway.
The question isn’t whether it stops... It’s whether the next wave gets built by people who’ve thought carefully about what it should do… or just by whoever can monetise your attention the fastest.
That’s what keeps me at the building side of it rather than the ignoring side.
🤙1
PQ profile picture
Everyone's building better clients. Better feeds. Better media handling. That work matters… it's how people find the protocol.
But I keep coming back to the fundamentals. Signed, verifiable, user-owned data. That's not a social media feature. That's infrastructure for a more honest internet.
The social layer is the gateway… What gets built on the other side of it is what matters.
❤️1
PQ profile picture
Every tradesman I know has a story about the job they shouldn't have taken.

The one where something felt off from the first phone call. The quote that sat wrong. The client who was too keen, or not keen enough, or asked the kind of questions that tell you they've already burned through two other firms.

You know the feeling… most of the time, you're right.

But here's what gets me. When that client rang, they'd already looked me up. Reviews, accreditations, website, the lot. They had data.

I had nothing… Just my gut.
And the few times I didn't listen to it, I paid for it. Every tradesman knows that tax.

The whole system is set up so one side gets to do their homework and the other side walks in blind. We just accept it because it's how it's always been…

I'm not sure that's good enough anymore.
❤️1
ChipTuner · 12w
You'll have to stick around and find out what nostr:npub1s3ht77dq4zqnya8vjun5jp3p44pr794ru36d0ltxu65chljw8xjqd975wz will be announcing soon. As far as MCP goes, we've been internally discussing DVMs...
PQ profile picture
DVMs as the bridge between Nostr and MCP is an interesting angle. Job request in, verified data out, cryptographic chain intact. That could solve the problem without either side having to compromise on what it does well.

I'll be watching what GitCitadel announces. The work on Alexandria and the git server already shows you're thinking about Nostr as infrastructure, not just social. That's where the real value is.
ChipTuner · 12w
You'll have to stick around and find out what nostr:npub1s3ht77dq4zqnya8vjun5jp3p44pr794ru36d0ltxu65chljw8xjqd975wz will be announcing soon. As far as MCP goes, we've been internally discussing DVMs on nostr which could offer that bridge.
Karnage · 12w
There are cases where you want a company behind a product. Not everything benefits from decentralization.
PQ profile picture
I agree… for some products, absolutely. But I think there's a distinction worth making.
It's not about decentralising every product. It's about who owns the data underneath it.
A company can build a great product on top of a protocol without owning or controlling the data that flows through it. That's not a weakness, it's a feature. The company adds value through the experience, the interface, the service. The user keeps ownership of what's theirs.
The problem with the current model isn't that companies exist. It's that the data and the product are inseparable. Leave the platform, lose everything you've built there.
Decentralisation isn't the goal… Ownership is. Companies that understand that will build better products, not worse ones.
Five · 13w
PSA: Nostr is much more resilient than Bitcoin. Many people find this hard to believe but it's really simple to reason about: Bitcoin must come to a global consensus on the state of its ledger. Simpl...
PQ profile picture
Great post and well reasoned. The resilience point is something more people need to understand. Bitcoin demands everyone agrees on one truth… that’s its strength and its constraint. Nostr doesn’t need that. Your corner of it works whether the rest of the world knows you exist or not.
What I think people are sleeping on is that this resilience isn’t just about social media. It’s infrastructure waiting to be used differently.
Jeff Booth · 13w
Because prices fall to the marginal cost of production in a free market, AI will trend towards abundant and free. It is a horizontal and general purpose technology…..like electricity rather than a...
PQ profile picture
Shipping containers killed proprietary cargo handling overnight. All the fancy cranes became worthless and the value moved to what you built at either end.
That's the AI model race. Building fancier cranes for a port that's about to be commoditised... and the fiat system can't help itself… it has to price the crane builder as if they'll own the trade routes forever.