@pico4
Relays (3)
- wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
- wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
- wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
Recent Notes
"The vast majority of OP_RETURNs are standard. The number of non standard OP_RETURNs has not increased since the release of bitcoin core v30 (which changed the longstanding OP_RETURN standardness rule...
It's really weird. Core supporters affirm having measured spam and having checked that the OP_RETURN cap raise hasn't changed anything, yet they affirm at the same time that there is no spam onchain, or that assigning something as spam is arbitrary.
BIP-110 is going to succeed, but if it doesn’t, you’d better have an exit strategy in mind.
Because if it fails, it will send a clear signal to the market that Bitcoin isn’t money anymore. At t...
I don't need any fork to succeed, after the signaling period and deadline I'll just stop accepting arbitrary data into my node.
#TU a declarar todo y
#ELLOS lo mínimo.
#TU ... no te equivoques sin querer, que te crujo,
#ELLOS ... queriendo, no te preocupes que ya veremos como lo arreglamos.
https://youtu.be/qsMS8E8XQZ0
[...
El estado está perdiendo fiabilidad y cortarles el grifo es una prioridad. Hay que dejar de pagar impuestos, y hacerlo de una manera que otorgue negación plausible. Hay que mover el dinero fuera de los protocolos y sistemas impuestos por ellos.
⚡️🚨 ICYMI - The U.S government gave Anthropic 90 minutes to shut down Fable and Mythos
“Amazon AND others” called senior administration officials to warn about models’ capabilities
The...
Marketing budget must have been massive for this one
1
How is it possible that SpaceX has more market cap than bitcoin, I see a huge asymmetry here
Makes me think how much Bitcoin can still grow
digital fiat should be chaumian ecash
100%. Institutions like the European Central Bank would be perfectly capable of providing a reliable and backed ecash system
❤️1
If I had one crate that I created with my effort, and someone came and copied it to get one for themselves without making any effort, I do not have any reason not to let them, apart from envy/pettines...
I know you established a permission system: It's yours, and it should be up to you who gets access to the crate, even for copying. From your point of view there is a violation of that system.
My point of view is: why would you make people ask for permission for benefiting from the same things as you, with no adittional cost to anyone? Why would you prefer less people to benefit from the same effort?
My point of view is: why would you make people ask for permission for benefiting from the same things as you, with no adittional cost to anyone? Why would you prefer less people to benefit from the same effort?
Lastly "letting you take a crate" is not what I said.
I said, of someone came in and took it without your permission, theft.
If I had one crate that I created with my effort, and someone came and copied it to get one for themselves without making any effort, I do not have any reason not to let them, apart from envy/pettiness (not wanting someone to have the same stuff as me while making less effort).
No one took my crate, I still have the same result after having spent the same effort/time/money on them.
A more direct example: Do you, after opening a door, let the person behind you pass along? Or do you slam the door shut against their face?
No one took my crate, I still have the same result after having spent the same effort/time/money on them.
A more direct example: Do you, after opening a door, let the person behind you pass along? Or do you slam the door shut against their face?
