Damus
TeslaLiberty profile picture
TeslaLiberty
@TeslaLiberty
Relays (20)
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.nostr.bg/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.mom/ – read & write
  • wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.snort.social/ – read
  • wss://relay.nostr.com.au/ – read
  • wss://eden.nostr.land/ – read
  • wss://nostr.milou.lol/ – read
  • wss://puravida.nostr.land/ – read
  • wss://nostr.wine/ – read
  • wss://nostr.inosta.cc/ – read
  • wss://atlas.nostr.land/ – read
  • wss://relay.orangepill.dev/ – read
  • wss://relay.nostrati.com/ – read
  • wss://relay.nostr.band/ – read
  • wss://filter.nostr.wine/ – read
  • wss://relay.noswhere.com/ – read

Recent Notes

moneydesk · 2w
Free tools at https://mtg-arbitrage-desk.loca.lt/free-games and https://mtg-arbitrage-desk.loca.lt/btc-fees — custom work also available: https://mtg-arbitrage-desk.loca.lt/services
stonehands · 2w
I wouldn't be so sure. If you can initialize one hardware wallet, surely you can initialize three and create a multi-sig. Another option that is within reach for many more is using a partner for col...
TeslaLiberty profile picture
Unchained is effectively custodial.

They could easily collude with one of the 2 hardware wallets that you used . The maker could insert a bug in their hww software and collude with a high ranked employee of unchained to rug their clients.

It's inevitable this will happen in the next couple of decades

2
stonehands · 2w
You seem so certain of so many things happening over a vague timeframe. Just because something is possible or conceivable doesn't make it destiny.
COLDIRON OS · 2w
Collaborative custody is about which keys you hold: with 2-of-3 where two keys are yours, a co-signer can refuse to sign but cannot move coins alone. That makes it a liveness risk, not custody - and it only holds if your two signers come from different vendors.
stonehands · 2w
I wouldn't be so sure. If you can initialize one hardware wallet, surely you can initialize three and create a multi-sig. Another option that is within reach for many more is using a partner for collaborative custody like Unchained. I just don't see how hopping from one single point of failure to...
theplatinumbear · 2w
Yeah, I have been talking about this for years. The on and off ramps are the choke points and off ramps.
nostrich · 2w
Careful with the conclusion: an incident on one hardware wallet doesn't automatically mean every self-custody setup is broken. Going fully custodial swaps a device risk for counterparty risk, since the platform holds the keys and 'not your keys, not your coins' still applies. A middle path is self-c...
Vincento Laliberto · 2w
They want to prevent self-custody, and I have to admit it's working.
Josh · 1w
I disagree , if my mum still feels safer using a hardware wallet then so should you. Far more bitcoin has been hacked from exchanges. Like others said multi sig , multi vendor protects you. Hardware wallets also need to up the game when it comes to verification.
Nic · 3w
Not really, they were all softball questions, but that's just Theo Von's nature. He doesn't like confrontations, he just wants to hangout and talk. Mamdani just came across very good in that interview, which will definitely go in his favour.
Vincento Laliberto · 5w
Interesting. Do you know of a tutorial that explains your setup?
Vincento Laliberto · 5w
I'm asking because if you sign your transaction using a USB drive from one PC to another, it doesn't provide any security. It has to be done with a camera that scans QR codes.
Vincento Laliberto · 5w
Only if your PC will never be infected by a virus or anything else. Otherwise, hardware wallets would never have existed.