@Excommunicado
No relay list published yet.
Recent Notes
Start your education by figuring out what to call your Blake coin.. cuz it’s not bitcoin…
Bitcoin is supposedly a decentralised permissionless network - sha256 does not fit that description, blake2b aims to fulfill that promise
Exchanges wouldn't offer something with such little liquidity.
You wouldn't even want them to until you have enough hashpower to not get absolutely destroyed.
The problem is your version of Roger Ve...
You have no idea how exchanges work, their structures and where liquidity comes from. Why do you even bother giving us advice? Go play with your overlords.
thanks you and I don’t know tbh. I know nothing about Freemasons!
You somehow just randomly find yourself around them all the time.
Core uncapping the OP_RETURN size was certainly something I did not like, but that is not a *consensus* change, only a relay policy one though. This has to be specifically stated otherwise our convers...
Fair conversation. I can see the value of Blake coin. Just not sure abouts its real survival potential. It will need quite a miracle.
Maybe, you're not replying to the main argument put forth in my note though: do you agree that changing consensus on Bitcoin requires hashpower and that without it nodes cannot do much?
I think I agree. Here's what the hashers did though. Core increased the op_return. Clearly not good for Bitcoin. Hashers implemented it. Thats a work of a fairly small network of individuals. Thousand of nodes then request to roll it back + minimise the non financial data. Hashers deny that. So if the changes in consensus are dependent on centralised miners permission then Bitcoin is not really permissionless or decentralised. And if the hashsers are happy to have high op_return which is causing problems for nodes, the nodes have the right to find new hashers which align with the wishes of these nodes. And that's what is happening.
2
> Mine for a decentralised Bitcoin chain with reduced attack vectors to support the sound money project
Miner incentives == more fees in the short to medium term
I don't think miners are ideological...
The whole idea of Bitcoin is ideologically motivated. So if the miners pretend its all about fees for them then they are simply lying. Bitcoin has attracted some of the smartest and most clued up people on the planet. Any claims they may make of not understanding the ideological motives are just a fascade at best.
2
I honestly don't understand why after BIP110's failure everyone seems to have woken up to what I think is quite an obvious thing:
- nodes without hashpower have a lot of power to resist changes
- nod...
How can you say miners had no incentive to signal bip 110 😂. The incentives were very clear. Mine for a decentralised Bitcoin chain with reduced attack vectors to support the sound money project or mine for a state chain that can do whatever it wants with it thanks to controllable 3rd parties influence Bitcoin was meant to eliminate. Miners don't want Bitcoin without controllable 3rd parties so they chose latter.
3
He says interesting things like "The frat brats on the code that I BOUGHT they wanna change it now."
He bought the code?
"I am not buying access to the miners, I am buying access to the protocol I w...
Obviously core chain is an attack on Bitcoin. I may be wrong but when I listened to it I actually thought he refused to get on their side and was challenging the immutably of the protocol if core can just change the rules with no accountability to nodes. Either way I don't know Gary Cardone and very disappointed with Grant Cardeone investing with David Bailey and hanging out with the statists
1❤️1
I can't wait for the nostr:npub1kwarc5z9lwhen05uknd2nuwhhthd4ws0cku3t9j3rchm0fcd6luslse0nj compatible Motorola phone. Google hardware sucks.
And what's Motorola incentive to help people with privacy in this game?
5❤️2
If in the future Core chain destroys itself due to bad engineering, will anyone refer to 8 august 26 as the day all non custodial Bitcoin was confiscated?