Well said.

100% correct.

Saylor stacked through multiple cycles while you sit here praying for a crash to feel smart. The lack of self-awareness is actually impressive.

Stashing large chunks with strong hands (institutions, corps) who aren't dumping is textbook bullish - it tightens supply and brings legitimacy, ETFs, and new capital. That's exactly why we're at $60k+ instead of $20k.

Calling it 'selling to the "wrong people" is just purity cope. Bitcoin is for everyone, not just the self-appointed guardians who decide who's "right". No one forced institutions to buy - the market voted.

It's a free and open protocol, so everyone gets their own vision of how Bitcoin should be used. Saylor has his, BlackRock has theirs, you have yours, and Odell has his. None are inherently wrong.

But here's the part that doesn't track, the same crowd constantly preaching 'you do you' and 'stop whinging about what others are doing' is the first to call everything that doesn't pass their purity test a scam, a lie, gatekeeping, or a psyop. Saylor and BlackRock didn't force anyone, there's a reason they've been so massively popular. People like their products. End of story. No one held a gun to retail or institutional heads, millions voluntarily handed over their money because they see upside with real exposure to Bitcoin.

Without that capital and mainstream adoption, we'd likely still be sitting around $20k wondering why nobody cares. The '20k BTC widely spread in perfect self-custody' ideal sounds nice in theory, but real-world progress required big players too.

You do you, and let others do the same without the endless gatekeeping and purity tests. That's how a permissionless network actually grows.

Odell and the purity police seething at anything that doesn't pass their test. Newsflash: without Saylor, BlackRock, and corporate adoption, Bitcoin would be at $20k. This may come as a surprise to you but believe it or not, Bitcoin doesn't just belong to Nostr purists.

Saylor has said on hundreds of occasions that he supports self-custody for those willing & able, and the right for everyone to do so. One nuanced take on institutions and somehow that's a 180. Meanwhile, real clowns like you and O'Dell cry about a guy who's stacked more BTC than your entire echo chamber, grow up.

New catchphrase for you Odell: Stay humble, gatekeep sats.
Preach permissionless freedom until someone actually uses Bitcoin without your blessing.

Hi I'm Odell, I co-run OpenSats taking Tether & ETF millions to fund devs on this pure permissionless protocol. But if Saylor or retail uses Bitcoin differently? Total lie and scam. Stay humble on my approved terms only

Corporate adoption is inevitable… but only if it follows Odell’s purity checklist. Otherwise it’s bad. The permissionless Bitcoin preacher everyone clapped for.

Preaching 'stay humble, stack sats' and 'Bitcoin is permissionless' while raging at anyone who actually uses it freely. Pick a lane.

Saylor: billions in BTC. Odell: 'shitcoiner'. The cope is elite.