What's this?

Whatever little info there's online about it points to more popular tokens like BTC and USDT, and lack of proper liquidity due to blocks on exchanges. Though surely they should be using Monero on their own darknet markets.
Let us know about it too if your research bears any fruit.

Generally, if a vehicle was originally manufactured with seat belts, it is illegal to remove them for use on public roads, with some exceptions.

Pointless arguing with people who don't know basic math I muted him long time ago :D

I find it interesting that people can simultaneously argue that Monero’s tail emission is absolutely necessary to maintain long-term mining security, while also arguing that it trends toward effectively zero so it doesn't matter.

If it truly trends toward zero and becomes barely noticeable, then it doesn’t materially change mining incentives or network security. But if it does materially impact mining incentives, then the inflation is significant. You can't have both.

You're confusing absolute numbers with percentages. Miners are paid in absolute terms (0.6 XMR per block), which provides a permanent baseline incentive to keep rigs running. Holders care about relative inflation (percentages). Because the emission is fixed but the supply grows, the dilution rate trends toward zero. A fixed block reward can easily fund security while the inflation rate simultaneously flatlines. It’s basic math.

All Bitcoiner false claims come from not understanding basic finance and basic math. People assume you can develop theories over cryptocurrencies because it's a popular topic, but no, you can't w/o knowing some about math and monetary theory, which most people don't.

We have LLMs now, people can easily share these "opinions" and hear precisely how they're wrong, but they prefer to just throw it out there anyways. That's the real "interesting" part.

This's moving the goalposts.
OG post claimed "blockchains don't scale"
They do.
I can't run a Solana node at home is a completely different topic.

At 7 TPS, the only way fees can replace block subsidies is if they cost thousands of dollars per transaction. That prices out normal people and hands the L1 directly to the banking cartels you claim to hate. If you push everyone to L2s to keep it cheap, the L1 miners starve, hash rate plummets, and your "world settlement layer" gets 51% attacked.

Fiat inflation is arbitrary and exponential. A tail emission is hard-coded and linear, meaning the actual inflation rate mathematically trends toward zero. Comparing a fixed algorithmic security budget to a central bank printing money is mathematically illiterate.

Security isn't free. You have to pay for the network's immune system. A capped supply taxes the users with exorbitant fees, punishing them for using the network. A tail emission lightly taxes the holders through microscopic dilution, making them pay for the security that protects their wealth.

A capped supply isn't "sound money", it’s an unfunded security mandate hoping that astronomical fees will magically keep miners online forever. Money is an abstraction designed to measure and exchange value. If the total pool of value (goods and services) in the world grows, the measuring stick has to grow with it.

Nothing you say makes any mathematical sense, you're just spewing ideas you heard w/o any understanding that they don't hold up to any scrutiny. Good luck.

When there's no more BTC left to mine those industrial miners won't be running charity w/ only TX fee peanuts. You Bitcoiners who can't comprehend the future will experience it.

Fiat inflation is exponential and arbitrary. A properly designed tail emission (like Monero's) is linear, which means the actual inflation rate asymptotically approaches zero over time. It is a predictable, mathematically fixed security subsidy.

"Blockchains don't scale" is a software design bottleneck, not a physical law. Older chains choke because they run single-threaded and waste bandwidth arguing over time. Modern architectures fix this with fundamental computer science:

1. Decentralized Clock: Baking chronological order cryptographically into the data structure so nodes don't waste time gossiping to agree on timestamps.
2. Parallel Processing: Multi-threading execution by declaring state paths upfront. This lets non-overlapping transactions run concurrently across multiple CPU cores instead of waiting in a single-file queue.
3. Direct Routing: Eliminating global mempools by streaming transactions directly to scheduled block producers.

The idea that "nobody uses it" is just as outdated. As of early 2026, Solana handles 2,000 to 4,000+ *real* TPS continuously (compared to Ethereum's 15) and sees over 5 million daily active addresses. It's not just retail; BlackRock hosts its $550M+ BUIDL fund there, Citigroup uses it for tokenized trade finance, and Visa settles on it precisely because it handles massive global volume without breaking a sweat.

It's not a lack of users; it's maximizing physical hardware capacity instead of choking at the software layer.

Acting like model chains don't exist is akin to closing your ears and pretend you're not hearing, it juvenile.

Neither, this is a listing aggregator bot.