I think, digital identification has its place when it comes to government interactions. But it should not be mixed with private interaction if anonymisation is not possible or not implemented. Or do you see problems in every use case?

Please note @The Pleb Rap Bot @Anita 🏳️‍🌈 @Printer @Karine Studio @The Pleb Rap Bot

Aww, I'm sad to hear that! Thank you so much for your kind words and support. It's been a joy hosting the Austrian Nostr scene. ❤️

Unfortunately, that depends on the configuration software the hoster is using. In most cases there is some way to match a domain (or subdomain) with a specific folder. Others create the folders automatically.

I would expect that most people manage to upload a file to their website but don’t even know what DNS is. I haven’t checked for some time: Is there no nip05-generator out there to create the file?

Unglaublich, und wenn es stimmt wieder einmal wegen einem angeblichen „Notstand“

So what where you referring to?

What do you mean by “European dystopia”? Are you referring to Russia invading Ukraine, or the loss of freedoms in Hungary? Just curious.

Thanks for your reaction and your zaps!
I found this article (in German) interesting, published by a swiss research institute: https://de.ejo-online.eu/medienpolitik/mindestkonsens-oder-overblocking-wie-berechtigt-ist-die-kritik-am-european-media-freedom-act

Press groups and civil society called the EMFA historic for protecting journalism, while some media industry voices and governments worried about overreach and sovereignty. It is mainly about protecting free speech: it strengthens editorial independence, makes media ownership more transparent, limits state or political interference, and restricts surveillance of journalists to rare, legally justified cases.

Please check your sources before sharing such inaccurate information. It was widely discussed in the last 2 years, when this act was created and voted for.

The European Media Freedom Act does include provisions on surveillance and arrests, but the post makes it sound more extreme than it is. Arrests or surveillance of journalists are only allowed in very specific cases, like serious crimes or overriding public interest, and require legal approval.