Overfitting?

What about this kind of thing @fiatjaf

This came from looking at OSS problems generally but really came into focus during yesterday's shitstorm regarding the testing library "Moq". How can you provide financial support to OSS projects without relying on sponsorships and donations but rather have some automated means? What if we use nip13 and delegate proof of work based on someone's contributions (weighted) to an OSS library (as in public repo) Also, you could zap projects but also automate zap on usage in CI/CD and you can't use if you don't have sats to zap and the only way to get them is to contribute (either by contributing proven work or by actually adding sats). We need a more sustainable model, I think this might be how we get there.

eh, no - not even close. Not a fanboy of JT here, but I do understand the reasoning. Media isn't quite the same up here as it is down in the States, but from my understanding, some of the arguments for Bill C-18 are:

- It would support the Canadian news industry, which has suffered from the loss of advertising revenue to tech platforms which regularly have attribution ripped from content.
- It would ensure fair and transparent negotiations between news publishers and tech platforms, and prevent platforms from discriminating against certain news sources.
- It would recognize the value of news content and the public interest in having access to diverse and reliable information.
- It would benefit small and local news outlets, which are more vulnerable to the dominance of tech platforms.

Why though? Aren't there enough performance-oriented dbs already designed?

Savior.