@nprofile1q... I have various flavors of neutral-to-negative reaction.
As a patient my reaction is pretty neutral at the moment, because my family and I have low medical needs and this stuff is still pretty peripheral. If one of my doctors were using tools like this, I might say, "Cool, so now what do YOU think?"
As someone who does some advocacy in this space, my main concern is exacerbation of existing problems and biases across the board. Incentives in our system are still aligned to squeeze efficiencies out of every little transaction, not improve care. An individual doctor or nurse practitioner might use this to build amazing tools -- I've seen some who have! But the system will use it to deny care. The triage systems discussed in the article are a good idea in theory but a nightmare in the wrong hands.
My greatest concerns are as a citizen. If these were purely open source neutral technologies available at no cost, I might say, "What the heck, give it a whirl." But if my doctor expressed a lot of enthusiasm about AI, I might ask, "How much do you know about the companies who make these tools..." and let the conversation evolve from there. :-/