It clearly states "random OR anonymous chat".

Any app with a chat function and without named accounts (does login with email cover this?) can be considered anonymous.

It depends on how they interpret it, but we've seen bans on freedom tech before, so I think interested parties should be prepared accordingly.

Netflix & Wolt

We have boltcards, how hard is it to put into software?

Sats are sats. We also have a great symbol for it, although not in unicode yet.
If ₿ is sats, how do you type 100m sats (1 Bitcoin)?
Or is the idea to completely ditch the 100m number and reactor everything as sats/₿?

I guess taking Greenland under US's wings won't be that difficult.

iTerm2, because I'm on a Mac, so what else?

"it just works" happened, combined with app-centric OSes.

Technology now caters to everyone, not just geeks.
It must work, even for grandmas.

Hence, no tinkering is needed, and many times isn't even possible (iOS, for example).

What really stumps me is that people don't know or understand basic filesystem structure.
They don't know about files/folders any more, as is the paradigm on desktop, in contrast with app-centric OSes.

They know apps, with their content. Many don't care to have their files offline, saved on disk, back them up etc. They work with them in the context of an app, and assume the app will always be there with their files, notes, documents, photos.

This is a fake Lyn Alden, in case you missed it.
Real Lyn: @Lyn Alden

Is this supposed to mean "Do you know what the date is?"?

And if an AI learns from nostr (like unleashed.chat), did I just teach it the answer (if correct)?

Then the sender is used once.
So the only public information is that a user has an incoming message from a random npub. Not much of an issue suppose.
This is awesome!

Your npub is @𝖋𝖎𝖆𝖙𝖉𝖊𝖓𝖎𝖊𝖗 (¯`◕‿◕´¯).
Send to @𝖋𝖎𝖆𝖙𝖉𝖊𝖓𝖎𝖊𝖗 (¯`◕‿◕´¯)@cashu.me and check your messages