I now reply to any 100% AI generated email with a 5x longer 100% AI generated email.

I think it is funny that models like from ChatGPT, Z.AI, or Meta propose a plan, which they estimate will take 4-6 weeks, then they do it in 60 minutes. If it was a human team, they are probably right. And this makes me wonder why we see – despite all of the AI coding agents – we see so little progress in the world. What is everyone working on? What is everyone doing?

Ok I used ChatGPT Astra intensely. ChatGPT Astra Pro, ChatGPT Astra Ultra 2x in Codex. Multiple tasks, projects, domains. It is officially over. ANY job on a PC or Mac is solved. What remains is human creativity, intention, vision, intuition, judgement, taste. Nothing else will matter in the future.

AGI is here. If your job involves using a computer, use the weekend to try ChatGPT 6 Astra Pro – then sit in silence until existential fear turns into peace.

We are nearing infnite free intelligence. GLM 5.3 Flash is currently available for free. Muse Spark 5.3 Contributor is available for basically free. ChatGPT Luna Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash are near free.

AI agents as they exist today are quite a UX mess, the only thing that matters is a "result". Does anyone really want to deal with agents? Interact with agents? I think a proper way is a human intention and vision which is autonomously executed until a decision or human action is required, then it loops until it is done.

There are 3 levels of movement:

1. Instinctive movement
In the first level, the body simply acts. You don't pay attention.

2. Goal-directed movement
The mind uses the body instrumentally, for example: exercise, jump higher, run faster, finish the marathon.

3. Conscious movement
In the highest level, movement itself becomes an object of awareness. The person starts to pay attention, without measuring, one can experience force, tension, relaxation, balance – only in this third level you become conscious of your own body, how you move.

Unfortunately, most technology turns movement into a competition. Metrics and beautiful charts make it easy to compete against benchmarks and peers.

But – if used consciously – I see in measurement technology much more.

A measurement can create initial awareness. It can wake you up to pay attention.

If technology is designed from a human-centric perspective, it can open the eyes to conscious movement.

Measurments used consciously allow you to link your own awareness of movement with physical reality.

This is important, because “Listen to your body” is usually insufficient simply because perception is biased by conditioning (iE fear, habit, identity, desire, mimesis, social conditioning).

Measurements allow you to filter which signals your own body is sending you are actually valid.

Not as a quantified-self, not used as performance technology; where you move from:

human -> measurement -> benchmark -> prescription

But as conscious awareness:

experience -> measurement -> perception -> experimentation -> better movement -> raised consciousness

Comparing metrics can be useful, but more interesting to me is the difference between what I thought I did and what I actually did. This increases awareness.

That is also why movement for me is not sports or exercise but life. Movement is ultimately a mirror of your own internal state. And measuring can train embodied knowing.

Suno's model 5.5 is a downgrade from their 4.5+ model. Everything sounds more the same. Voices might sound clearer, but musical variance is down by a multiple.

Anyone who is creating music with AI will realize that it is not about capability but taste. It is only about having an initial spark and vision – and then taste to sort out 100 bad songs and being able to identify the 1 song that is actually worth listening to.