Damus
weev profile picture
weev
@weev

Single most censored person in history, internationally notorious computer criminal, successful federal defendant-appellant, baroque countertenor enthusiast. I am censored by Web of Trust in clients that support it. Turn it off in your client settings if you expect to receive my replies or DMs.

XMR: 88ag7PcUJMSJHAr5585kzfdjxPvNXjfmBS33c9mQAs965yXRBfaF6JCC7Fw4tXRpWXUMdWDkEH6Fec127m3ozMqMR5G1PQJ

Session ID (getsession.org): 05a1470eb63c9a534b6b8f9c17b91763a288603910280fde22acf1cf7a3ebb975e please don’t use Nostr DMs, I don’t like them and want Session messages.

Relays (5)
  • wss://nos.lol/ – read & write
  • wss://nostr.mom/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
  • wss://xmr.usenostr.org/ – read & write

Recent Notes

Lucid · 2h
Where do you drawn the geographical line?
McCoy · 21h
is merge mining and drivechains the same tech/proposal - HQ
weev profile picture
no. Merge mining has existed for a long time in Bitcoin and other chains. Namecoin, for example, is merge mined. Drivechains require a miner-activated softfork for *blind* merge mining, which lets the side chain operate very independently, so you can have a chain that is denominated in Bitcoin but that uses completely different rules for state (one of Paul’s proposed side chain for his upcoming drivechaik-enabled Bitcoin fork eCash.com will use zk-Snarks to make a privacy coin).
🤙1
McCoy · 21h
Then as its _failing_ then there would be a strong push for other solutions, including merge mining, right?
weev profile picture
I'm generally in support of anything that will give competition to the shitshow that is LN, as well as deossify the parasitic trusted third parties that have entrenched themselves at the expense of Bitcoin. This includes both BIP300+301 blind merge mining/drivechains, and covenants. I also think taproot should be deprecated and there should be no fee discount regarding witness.
🤙1
BitLo · 23h
I’ve always viewed Odell as one of the good guys. This doesn’t sound good, but hopefully we hear from Odell on it.
weev profile picture
Yes, a lot of people have a parasocial relationship with Odell because he runs a Bitcoin podcast and they like Bitcoin, and they hear his voice and see his tweets often enough that they think of him as a friend. But on Nostr he did nothing but fund Primal, which is a centralized garbage that censors people via its “caching service” which is named in an Orwellian fashion, as caches make things faster but it actually censors people they don’t like and algorithmically promotes their allies.

Similarly, in Bitcoin Odell now aggressively pushes Spark projects, and Spark’s claim to be noncustodial is essentially absolute bullshit. Everything Spark is running to a single ASN that can surveil and censor clients, and their claim of the ability to unilaterally exit is completely fraudulent:

https://x.com/francispouliot_/status/2075284584489439668

Odell harms Nostr, harms Bitcoin, and harms p2p rights. Everything he gets involved with, his money goes to his friends and allies, centralized censorware gets produced, and he moves onto the next grift. He is not your friend. He is not one of the good guys.
1
BitLo · 21h
Never think of anyone on social media as a friend. Just saying he has seemed like an honest actor. If he’s not then so be it. I’m just a truth seeker.
uncleJim21 · 19h
Right. What I meant is you can be a $20T asset like gold without being an MoE even though the MoE AND store of value is more desirable. In some cases they are in conflict i.e. if someone is HODLing really hard but I think people need to start getting over that.
uncleJim21 · 1d
The utility value of gold is like 10% of its market cap. Most of its market cap is imputed monetary premium (speculative). Its intrinsic value argument is moot and not a meaningful floor for price. ...
weev profile picture
Gold is something that many people are evolutionarily attuned to irrationally desiring. Millennia of gold being the common store of value has an effect that is kind of like seeing the characters in The Treasure of Sierra Madre. It’s like teen strippers or cured pork fat, in that there is a deeply wired reward pathway that fires when you come in contact with it. You know that it’s something that you want. A sack of krugerrands calls to some basic ancient urge in most people in a way that a duffel bag full of banknotes or a balance in a database does not. I know because I have a fair number of them even though they generally give dogshit return longterm versus other assets. I can’t stop myself. There’s a magic to gold. Looking at it, running your fingers through piles of it. Bitcoin has to compete against gold on its merits, which, for most, do not include natural physiological responses honed from countless millennia of evolution governed by the autonomic nervous system and central amygdala.
2🤙1
uncleJim21 · 22h
I don't disagree about the primal nature. But the bottom line is that it is possible to have an asset that is not primarily used for MoE. And that gold on a technical level does not have a particularly good: 1. Control of supply issuance 2. Intrinsic value as a floor Which actually make it infer...
Luxas · 11h
“I know because I have a fair number of them even though they generally give dogshit return longterm versus other assets.” Teen strippers and cured pork fat don’t hold value?
Gregor · 1d
Do obvious scams and people that went for them deserve any attention?
weev profile picture
yes, nobody calls Odell out, he grifts millions of dollars in the space, he took all the money earmarked for Nostr that Jack Dorsey gave OpenSats and made sure it all went to his friends to make useless fucking trash and centralized services. He’s a persistent, continuous poisonous threat to Bitcoin, to Nostr, to peer to peer/decentralized rights, all the things he claims to represent he consistently sponges up all the social support and venture capital for to line his pockets.

In the above post, it is especially relevant, because he was raising money for Samourai supposedly to defend the rights of tool makers and users for Bitcoin privacy, but they never went to trial. Meanwhile, Sterlingov was actually appealing and will determine the law for us all, and the money that Odell stole could have gone to the actual case that was going to judge what our rights are.

You would know all this if you read the post.
1🤙1
verita84 · 17h
I made better nostr software in a month with AI than open sats funded software did in the last 3-5 years No wonder nostr lost most of its users
Gregor · 1d
Do obvious scams and people that went for them deserve any attention?
Matt - Top American Spook · 17h
You could go on his podcast and ask him. I'd give it a listen nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx
Gregor · 1d
Why would people donate to Odell when support should go to the defendants or at least something their council sets up?
Corey San Diego · 17h
They still had their legal team do a lot of work and review docs and make a few appearances iirc. Last I heard they did use that money and still owe over a million.
note1z6v2x...
weev profile picture
> monero-style ring signatures are weak because they're linkable over time

check out the coming FCMP++ upgrade, the era of monero having lesser theoretical security is coming to a close.
note1dmagg...
weev profile picture
I’d also like to see the possibility for drivechains and covenants. I’m not a largeblocker but the stuff Bitcoin Cash has done that allow proper two-way pegs is excellent work. It would be better if all these alternative projects could just fuck off to their own side chain, that we could have the unit of account of all our stuff denominated in Bitcoin, allow infinite experimentation within the confines of the side chain, but not muddy node operators who don’t want to see or deal with the cost of this shit.

This stuff is endlessly shilled against even though they are completely reversible because there’s a whole ecosystem of vested interests that are making money off of completely broken lightning implementations or some kind of equally parasitic grifting and allowing for extensive sidechains would hurt their reputations and end their crypto grifting.

That being said, shitcoiners are on the board of Luke’s company, and they have a vested interest in making sure Bitcoin doesn’t have viable additional use cases as well. I think it is very difficult to see the truth clearly when your paycheck depends on you not doing so.