Damus

Recent Notes

Tiago Cypherpunk 🐍 · 23w
Sim, com certeza! Tentar "impedir" que as pessoas paguem para colocar qualquer tipo de informação no timechain é tolice. Essa discussão já é velha e, eu particularmente estou com o Bitcoin Core...
ynh profile picture
No calor do momento, eu havia migrado para Knots, mas depois de um tempo, reverti meu node para Core 28.1, porque refleti melhor, e achei mais prudente.
Ainda não atualizei para 29, no entanto. Preferi esperar para ver o desfecho dos debates.

Obrigado pelo post.
❤️1🧡1
Whitesnake · 24w
Seleção natural.
Prometheus Hodl · 24w
Bora https://youtube.com/live/W6dmezxScz4
ynh profile picture
Fala, mano. Vi lá a live. Beleza.

Às vezes a Bitchat não conecta de primeira os peers em mesh (bluetooth), então, fecho e reinicio o aplicativo e as conexões acontecem.

Fuça lá: tem como acessar via uma geotag (o app traz até um mapa, que vai facilitar entender o que são as "geotags"), utilizando a Internet.

Valeu. Obrigado por suas contribuições.
🤙1
Prometheus Hodl · 24w
Top vou fuçar e estudar melhor agora q tem pra usar, valeu pelas dicas TMJ
Chuckin Bitcoin · 28w
What you said makes no sense. In a Bitcoin transaction the UTXO's get destroyed and all Satoshi's within it remelded into new UTXO's with no consideration of any satoshis being "tainted" or not. That ...
ynh profile picture
Sorry. I cannot agree.

Each satoshi carries an history. And it is trivial to verify it: Identifying ang tracking any unit of satoshi can be done with ease: this makes bitcoin non fungible.

It is fungible, any thing, when it is not possible to tell apart an item from another of the same species.

One can taint and track a gold bar, for example. But "gold", the substance, is fungible ... even though a gold bar may not be fungible (due to eventual marks, numbers, registres, etc), it is enough to melt it, and form a new bar ( the atoms are not easily discernable from each other).
Mixers (coinjoin) seem to be, for Bitcoin, what melting is to a gold bar, IMHO.
1
nostrich · 28w
This is pure bullshit "Each satoshi carries an history. And it is trivial to verify it: Identifying ang tracking any unit of satoshi can be done with ease: this makes bitcoin non fungible." Where exactly does each satoshi carry the history?
Chuckin Bitcoin · 28w
Go read the defintion of Fungible then come back. It has nothing to do with tracking, tainting, marking, or subjective observations. There are no low satoshis or high satoshis or red satoshis or blue satoshis or tainted satoshis. There are only Satoshis which are ALL equal and interchangable with no...
Chuckin Bitcoin · 28w
What you said makes no sense. In a Bitcoin transaction the UTXO's get destroyed and all Satoshi's within it remelded into new UTXO's with no consideration of any satoshis being "tainted" or not. That is fungibility
nostrich · 28w
No one can taint a Bitcoin coin or a sat. One can taint an address only. Bitcoin is decentralized so no one can stop any address from transacting.
Chuckin Bitcoin · 28w
Bitcoin is fungible. Nodes do not care about marked/tracked satoshis. Every Satoshi is valued the same by the Bitcoin Network. Any transaction you make can not be blocked. A particular person/exchange can "freeze" your account/relationship with them but that has nothing to do with fungibility. That'...
nostrich · 28w
Read again the definition of fungible money. Then read it however many times you need until you understand what fungible money means. Bitcoin is fungible money.
ΛM · 30w
I'm betting nostr:nevent1qqsdpt3qvy2d83ghz0sce49r4ycpklywy4u0cmfr40czyyltmg3w0mgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgn5xrup
nostrich · 31w
O Adolfo era amado pelo povo alemão, assim como Bolsonaro que não ergueu uma flor contra o comunismo e virou frouxonaro. O Stalin assassinou milhões do "próprio" povo, assim parece mas ele era judeu e odiava os russos.