@Krv
No relay list published yet.
Recent Notes
I HATE ORDINALS BUT I DON’T LIKE BEING TOLD, HOW I CAN USE BITCOIN.
People can choose to do what they want, but they can't choose the effects of policies. Immutable storage use case works against the sound money use case. Former drives up resource usage making running nodes more costly, reducing node distribution: prices out small utxos rendering them less valuable or valueless.
BITCOIN HAS A BRILLIANT SPAM MECHANISM: TRANSACTION FEES.
Sound money is an infinitely more important use case, so btc should optimize for that, which means minimizing the immutable storage use case.
Bitcoin: A global, neutral money that promises to reign in governments and prevent wars
...but we're not sure if we should patch putting dick pics directly on it
Optimizing the money use over the storage case sounds extremely important to me.
UX specialists may be partially responsible for the dumbing down of the computer users over time.
Perhaps, then, a well designed UX can teach good things instead.
On Ocean Mining Pool, Inscriptions and Luke
———————————————
There's been a pretty big flare up in the Bitcoin community about Ocean Mining's two recent blocks. Namely, t...
If the were to patch the unintended code that allows ordinals, would that be censorship?
"IT IS FILTERING NOT CENSORSHIP"
Y'ALL GETTING YOUR DOUBLE SPEAK STYLE TALKING POINTS FROM THE US TREASURY?
I oppose all censorship, but ordinals are exploiting a bug. They would not normally be there. So, if they fix the bug, is that censorship?
1🤙1
MINING POOLS THAT CENSOR BITCOIN TRANSACTIONS ARE AN ATTACK ON BITCOIN. ANY SELF RESPECTING MINER SHOULD NOT MINE WITH SUCH A POOL.
ON A POSITIVE NOTE, POOLS THAT DO NOT CENSOR WILL EARN MORE IN FEES...
If ordinals are utilizing a bug, the not including them is more like aworkaround than censorship.