The UK talks about becoming a global digital asset hub while bitcoin businesses continue scaling elsewhere. Gemini’s departure reflects structural reality, not execution friction.
The problem is structural misunderstanding rather than regulatory speed.
By categorising everything as “crypto” under a same risk same regulation framework, UK policy fails to distinguish bitcoin companies from token based ventures. These models differ materially.
Many bitcoin businesses:
* Operate long-term treasury strategies
* Hold reserves in bitcoin
* Rely less on cyclical fundraising
* Maintain globally portable capital
This changes their cost of capital, risk profile, and sensitivity to jurisdiction.
When compliance burdens are high relative to opportunity, and regulatory transition remains uncertain, mobile capital reallocates.
As global institutions increasingly treat bitcoin as infrastructure rather than speculation, mispricing this distinction risks weakening the UK’s competitive position.
The question is no longer whether bitcoin businesses will adapt.
It is whether policymakers will engage with the structural shift underway.
From 26 - 29 March 2026, CheatCode Conference returns under the theme “The Great Realignment,” examining how bitcoin is reshaping capital markets, energy systems, and business models.
Susie Violet Ward will be speaking on these themes and the widening gap between bitcoin business models and legacy regulatory assumptions. Readers can receive an exclusive 20% discount on tickets using code BTCPOLICY on the CheatCode website.
Read the full article here:
https://bitcoinpolicy.uk/blog-1/f/why-the-uk-keeps-misunderstanding-bitcoin-businesses@Susie Violet @fnew @Peter McCormack