Like many other quotes in my life, this one by ODELL had its aha moment. But something that I never experienced with another one in the past is having multiple aha moments around the same quote. So powerful…

I agree such features are against the ethos. Yet Nostr remains decentralized and no client/platform can permanently change that.

how is primal centralized? could you please quickly enlighten me or share some post?

“uBlock Origin Lite (manifest v3)” seems to be the new way to go but I’m not into the details yet

I could read that but I need first you to answer the following two questions:

Do you want to see btc success in the future or it is about something else? How much time is worth for that to get materialized based on your time-preference?

I understand why you need specific answers. IMHO, they are not yet available but will be in future if and only if everything goes well.

But I’m reaching my level of understanding (game theory) in btc at this point.

So I will remain as reader and see what others have to say about this

I understand why you need specific answers. IMHO, they are not yet available but will be in future if and only if everything goes well.

But I’m reaching my level of understanding (game theory) in btc at this point.

So I will remain as reader and see what others have to say about this

great points/cases in there Chuck, thanks for sharing.

Personally I think he didn’t ignore your points. While he didn’t directly addressed them. What can make all of us a bit anxious for sure :)

In my opinion, he is a believer that the evolution of what we know today as btc based on our future us being more educated people spending in bitcoin-only creating new tools/adding-nodes/better-layers will be ultimately overcoming the attack (some of the valid cases your are detailing).

“Human action is what is centralizing” - I read this as btc gets tainted because it is being centralized it in first place.

Didn’t want to add noise in here just trying to contribute to this discussion and learn from you guys

Conclusion is: there isn’t a Super Cycle in the horizon, right?

In other words, it is behaving as usual or this just me not depicting the graph/idea properly?

Hmm interesting technique, it is me not knowing very well tmate, but how do “await” from the remote session so you can ssh to test/eval?

You will be spending valuable compute minutes that should be for automation purposes but if that can accelerate the “development effort” of the gh action itself that usually is very trial an error, I can see the value in there.

I really got the point that the action of no printing (fixed supply) is deflationary.

Still as soon as fees get higher, the prices in Bitcoin should/could speculate following the same trend.

Am I missing something here?

I really got the point that the action of no printing is deflationary.

Still as soon as fees get higher, the prices in bitcoin should/could speculate following the same trend.

Am I missing something here? I’m still that fiat-locked at this point?